Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Risk regulation, trade and international law: debating the precautionary principle in and around the WTO

By Christiane Gerstetter and Matthias Leonhard Maier

Abstract

The precautionary principle is one of the most contested principles in international law. In the context of trade regulation in particular, it has been a source of concern to those who fear that it might help to justify existing non-tariff barriers to trade or create addi-tional ones. Proponents of the principle, in turn, argue that it is needed to fend off un-warranted health and environmental risks in situations where scientific uncertainty pre-vails, even if this works against the liberalisation of trade. In these contests the question of where and when the precautionary principle should be applied is inextricably linked to the question of what it means in the first place. Starting from the observation that consensus on a precise definition is missing both in legal-political practice and in aca-demic scholarship, the present paper is concerned precisely with those practical inter-pretative contests which result from the principle's ambiguity. We focus on attempts to agree legally binding definitions in the context of international trade regulation. The core of the paper is an empirical analysis of debates on several specific aspects of the precautionary principle, which were at issue during the past decade in four different international institutions: the WTO dispute settlement, some of the WTO's political committees, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (in particular its Committee on Gen-eral Principles), and the conference of states which negotiated the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Differences and similarities among these institutions are then analysed in a comparative perspective, taking up various contested issues one by one. From our findings we derive a set of hypotheses regarding the conditions under which, and the legal or political pathways on which, the precautionary principle (and perhaps other abstract normative ideas of a similar type as well) can make a difference to the out-comes of international decision-making. --

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A call for coherence in international law - praises for the prohibition against "clinical isolation" in WTO dispute settlement.
  2. (1999). A Map Toward Precautionary Decision Making. In Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle, edited by
  3. (2003). A nexus of trade and the environment: the relationship between the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
  4. (1998). A real world where people live and work and die: Australian SPS measures after the WTO Appellate Body's decision in the hormones case.
  5. (1992). Addressing uncertainty: Law, policy and the development of the precautionary principle. Addressing uncertainty: Law, policy and the development of the precautionary principle.
  6. (2000). Alternative paradigms: The WTO versus the biosafety protocol for trade in genetically modified organisms.
  7. (2001). Alternatives to "Legalization": Richer Views of Law and Politics.
  8. (2003). An Explanatory Guide to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. An Explanatory Guide to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
  9. (2000). An overview of the WTO agreements on health and technical standards and their impact on communication. Zeitschrift für das gesamte
  10. (2001). Applying SPS in WTO disputes. In Globalization and the environment: risk assessment and the WTO, edited by
  11. (2002). Australia-salmon and compliance issues surrounding the SPS agreement: sovereign acceptance and measure adaptation. Law and Policy
  12. (2003). Beyond the precautionary principle.
  13. (2003). Biopolitics in the EU and the U.S.: A Race to the Bottom or Convergence to the Top?
  14. (2002). Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe.
  15. (2000). Considerations regarding the Hormones case, the precautionary principle and international dispute settlement procedures.
  16. (2003). Debating the Precautionary Principle: 'Guilty until Proven Innocent' or 'Innocent until Priven Guilty'?
  17. (1998). Der Bericht des Appellate Body der WTO zum EG-Einfuhrverbot von Hormonfleisch. Risikoregulierung im Weltmarkt. Europäisches Wirtschafts-
  18. (1998). Die Entscheidung des WTO Appellate Body im Hormonfall: Doch ein Recht auf Vorsorge? Europäische Zeitschrift für
  19. (1999). Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle.
  20. (2005). Disentangling the Interaction between the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organisation. Paper read at International Studies Association Annual Convention,
  21. (2005). Environmental Policies and the CTE: A Record of Failure? Environmental Policies and the CTE: A Record of Failure?: Universität Bremen, Sfb "Staatlichkeit im Wandel".
  22. (2002). Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules.
  23. (2002). Environmental regulatory decision making under uncertainty.
  24. (2000). EU communication on the precautionary principle.
  25. (2003). European regulation of GMOs and the WTO.
  26. (2000). Fine-tuning WTO jurisprudence and the SPS Agreement: lessons from the beef hormone case. Law and Policy
  27. (1999). Free trade, public health protection and consumer information in the European and WTO context: Hormone-treated beef and genetically modified organisms.
  28. (2000). Genetically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities.
  29. (2001). Globalization and the environment: risk assessment and the WTO.
  30. (2004). Grüne Gentechnik und Welthandel: Das Biosafety-Protokoll und seine Auswirkungen auf das Regime der WTO.
  31. (2002). Institutional Linkage: Transcending "Trade and..."
  32. (2004). Interaction between International Environmental Institutions: Causal Mechanisms and Effects.
  33. (2003). International regime conflict in trade and environment: the Biosafety Protocol and the WTO.
  34. (2000). Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.
  35. (2002). Japan - Measures affecting agricultural products: lessons for future SPS and agricultural trade disputes.
  36. (1998). Keeping the WTO from becoming the "World Trans-sciene Organization": scientifc uncertainty, science policy, and factfinding in the growth hormones dispute.
  37. (2002). L'accord de l'organsation mondiale du commerce sur l'application des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires: une analyse juridique. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
  38. (2002). Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
  39. (2002). Lebensmittelrechtliche Vorsorge als Rechtsprinzip - nationale, europäische und welthandelsrechtliche Aspekte. Vorsorge. Bremen: Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik an der
  40. (2001). More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops.
  41. (2002). Negotiating the biosafety protocol: the international process.
  42. (2002). Negotiating the precautionary principle: regulatory and institutional roots of divergent US and EU positions.
  43. (1996). Origins and Development of the Precautionary Principle.
  44. (2003). Precaution in World Trade Law: The Precautionary Principle and its Implications for the World Trade Organisation. Precaution in World Sfb 597 „Staatlichkeit im Wandel“ -
  45. (2002). Precaution, Precaution Everywhere: Developing a 'Common Understanding' of the Precautionary Principle in the European Community.
  46. (2002). Precautionary principles: General definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms.
  47. (2001). Precautionary uncertainty: Regulating GM crops in Europe.
  48. (2000). Protection of public health and the role of the precautionary principle under WTO law: a trojan horse before Geneva's walls?
  49. (2004). Risk Assessment in the European Food Safety Regulation: Who is to Decide Whose Science is Better? Commission v. France and Beyond.
  50. (2002). Risk regulation in WTO law: A procedure-based approach to the precautionary principle.
  51. (2004). Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as an International Normative Yardstick? Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as an International Normative Yardstick?
  52. (2003). Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants.
  53. (2003). Science-based Rules of Trade – A Mantra for Some, An Anathema for Others. Estey Centre
  54. (2002). Scope. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, edited by H.
  55. (2000). Settlement of science-based trade disputes in the WTO: a critical review of the developing case law in the face of scientifc uncertainty.
  56. (2002). Six years on the bench of the 'world trade court': some personal experiences as member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization.
  57. (1997). Social Decision-Making Under Conditions of Scientific Controversy, Expertise and the Precautionary Principle. In Integrating scientific expertise into regulatory decision-making: National traditions and European innovations, edited by
  58. (2002). Socio-economic considerations.
  59. (1981). Taking Rights Seriously. 3rd ed.
  60. (2003). The appropriate hierarchy of global multilaterlism and customary international law: the example of the WTO.
  61. (2003). The biosafety protocol and the WTO.
  62. (2000). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An analysis of results. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An analysis of results. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Sfb 597 „Staatlichkeit im Wandel“ -
  63. (2000). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
  64. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge:
  65. (2003). The European Community's evolving precautionary principle: Comparisons with the United States and ramifications for the Doha Round trade negotiations.
  66. (2001). The Evolution of the Precautionary Principle. In Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, edited by
  67. (1998). The first case under the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: the European Union's hormone ban.
  68. (2004). The First Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The First Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Sustainable Development Programme.
  69. (2003). The introduction of the precautionary principle into EU law: a pyrrhic victory for environmental and public health law? Decision-making under conditions of complexity in multilevel political systems.
  70. (2002). The juridification of uncertainty: observations on the ambivalence of the precautionary principle within the EU and the WTO.
  71. (2002). The Looming Trade War over Plant Biotechnology. The Looming Trade War over Plant Biotechnology. Washington: Center for Trade Policy Studies,
  72. (2003). The myth of science as a "neutral arbiter" for triggering precautions.
  73. (2000). The Precautionary Preference: An American Perspective on the Precautionary Principle.
  74. (2002). The precautionary principle and marine environmental protection: Slippery shores, rough seas, and rising normative tides.
  75. (1999). The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policy and politics. In Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle, edited by
  76. (2002). The precautionary principle in the European Union and its impact on international trade relations. The precautionary principle in the European Union and its impact on international trade relations. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
  77. (2001). The Precautionary Principle in WTO Law. Doctoral dissertation,
  78. (2004). The Precautionary Principle, Risk Assessment, and the Comparative Role of Science in the European Community and the US Legal Systems.
  79. (2000). The precautionary principle: A European perspective.
  80. (2002). The Precautionary Principle: New Development in the Case Law of the Court of First Instance.
  81. (2002). The precautionary principle.
  82. (2002). The Precautionary Principle’s Challenge to Progress. In Global Warming and Other Eco-Myths: How the Environmental Movement Uses False Science to Scare Us to Death, edited by
  83. (2004). The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.
  84. (2002). The Relationship between Risk Analysis and the Precautionary Principle.
  85. (2002). The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and trade: a map of the World Trade Organization law of domestic regulations of goods.
  86. (1999). The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as applied in the first three disputes - EC-Hormones, Autralia - Salmon, Japan - Varietals.
  87. (2002). Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements.
  88. (2003). Using precaution principle to protect human health: Pfizer v Council.
  89. (2002). Verfassungsrechtliche Dimensionen der Welthandelsorganisation.
  90. (2002). What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications.
  91. (2003). Wissens- und ideenorientierte Ansätze in der Politikwissenschaft: Versuch einer systematischen Übersicht. In Politik als Lernprozeß? Wissensorientierte Analysen der Politik, edited by

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.