Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Board structure and modified audit opinions: the case of the Portuguese Stock Exchange

By Jorge Farinha and Luis Filipe Viana


Prior research has found evidence that some characteristics of the board of directors influence the quality of accounting information (e.g., Beasley, 1996; Dechow et al., 1996; Klein, 2002a; Xie et al., 2003). In this study we extend the literature by analysing a different dimension of accounting information quality, the probability of a firm receiving a modified audit opinion. Using a sample of companies listed on Euronext Lisbon where firms can publish financial statements not in accordance with GAAP, unlike the current situation in other markets like the US, and 91 firm-year observations for the period 2002-03, we find evidence consistent with the hypotheses that board diligence and independence contribute negatively to the probability of a modified opinion, while board size is not statistically significant. Our results are robust to different specifications and also show that financial health, performance, growth opportunities and the existence of dividend payments are additional factors affecting the likelihood of a modified audit opinion.auditing, modified opinions, accounting quality, board structure, corporate governance, non-executive directors

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000a), “Detecting earnings management using cross-sectional abnormal accrual models”,
  2. (2000b), “Accrual management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence pre and post Cadbury”,
  3. (1991). A Perspective on the Use of Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables Models in Accounting Research”, The Accounting Review¸Vol.
  4. (1999). A Review of Earnings Management Literature and its Implications for Standard Setting”,
  5. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals”,
  6. (1995). Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management”,
  7. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director
  8. (2002). Audit Committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management”,
  9. (2004). Audit Quality and the Going-concern Decision-making Process: Spanish Evidence”,
  10. (1998). Auditor changes and discretionary accruals”,
  11. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality”,
  12. (2000). Auditors Consideration of Corporate Governance and Management Control Philosophy in Preplanning and Planning Judgments”, Auditing:
  13. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada”,
  14. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance”,
  15. (2004). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?”, Working paper,
  16. Câmara dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas (2004), “Aplicação das Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade”, Edição em CD-ROM.
  17. (1996). Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC”,
  18. (2003). Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications”,
  19. (2005). Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals”,
  20. (1998). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness”,
  21. (2001). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management”, working paper.
  22. (2002). Corporate Governance and the Audit Process”,
  23. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals”,
  24. (2000). Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications”,
  25. (1996). Discussion of A Market-Based Evaluation of Discretionary Accrual Models”,
  26. (2000). Do firms mislead investors by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings”,
  27. (2002). Do NonAudit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions”,
  28. (1996). Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings”,
  29. (1994). Does Auditing Reduce Bias in Financial Reporting? A Review of
  30. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions”,
  31. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee”,
  32. (2003). Earnings management and investor Protection: an international comparison”,
  33. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations”,
  34. (1994). Earnings management preceding management buyout offers”,
  35. (1997). Earnings Management to avoid earnings decreases and losses”,
  36. (1999). Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds”,
  37. (2000). Earnings Management: Reconciling the Views of Accounting Academics,
  38. (2004). Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors Planning and Pricing Decisions”,
  39. (2002). Earnings Surprises, Growth Expectations, and Stock Returns or Don’t Let an Earnings Torpedo Sink Your Portfolio”,
  40. (1997). Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall International, Third Edition.
  41. (2002). Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence”,
  42. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice”,
  43. (2002). Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research”,
  44. (2001). Evidence About Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client’s Financial Reporting”,
  45. (1988). Evidence of Earnings Management from the Provision for Bad Debts”,
  46. (1999). Financial Reporting Council (2003), “The Combined Code on Corporate Governance”, in
  47. (2004). How Are Earnings Managed? An Examination of Specific Accruals”,
  48. (2003). How Are Earnings Managed? Examples from Auditors”, Accounting Horizons, Supplement
  49. (2000). Identifying unexpected accruals: a comparison of current approaches”,
  50. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance”,
  51. (1995). Issues in Testing Earnings Management and an Instrumental Variable Approach”,
  52. (2003). Likely Effects of Stock Exchange Governance Proposals and Sarbanes-Oxley on Corporate Boards and Financial Reporting”,
  53. (2002). Management’s Incentives to Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises”,
  54. Maydew (2004a), “How Much Will Firms Pay for Earnings That Do Not Exist? Evidence of Taxes Paid on Allegedly Fraudulent Earnings”, The Accounting Review,
  55. (1983). Maydew (2004b), “Is There a Link Between Executive Compensation and Accounting Fraud?”, working paper.
  56. (2000). Mercado de Valores Mobiliários (2003), “Recomendações da CMVM sobre o Governo das Sociedades Cotadas”.
  57. (1998). Montgomery’s Auditing,
  58. (1999). On the association between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management”,
  59. (2004). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
  60. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs,
  61. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective,
  62. (2003). Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting. International Federation of Accountants
  63. (1980). Regression Diagnostics”,
  64. (2000). Research design issues in earnings management studies”,
  65. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings”,
  66. (2003). Stock-based pay in new economy firms”,
  67. (2001). The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals”,
  68. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice: Implications of costly contracting and monitoring”,
  69. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions”,
  70. (2002). The Financial Numbers Game,
  71. (2006). The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms”, working paper.
  72. (1995). The information content of losses”,
  73. (1996). The pricing of discretionary accruals”,
  74. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors”, The Accounting Review,
  75. (2002). The relation between Auditor’s Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management”, The Accounting Review,
  76. (2004). The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover", working paper.
  77. (1993). The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation”,
  78. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”,
  79. (1978). Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards”,
  80. Wasley (2005), “Performance matched discretionary accrual measures”,
  81. Wong (1998a), “Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings”,
  82. Wong (1998b), “Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.