Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Explaining the structure of inter-organizational networks using exponential random graph models: does proximity matter?

By Tom Broekel and Matte Hartog

Abstract

A key question raised in recent years is which factors determine the structure of inter-organizational networks. While the focus has primarily been on different forms of proximity between organizations, which are determinants at the dyad level, recently determinants at the node and structural level have been highlighted as well. To identify the relative importance of determinants at these three different levels for the structure of networks that are observable at only one point in time, we propose the use of exponential random graph models. Their usefulness is exemplified by an analysis of the structure of the knowledge network in the Dutch aviation industry in 2008 for which we find determinants at all different levels to matter. Out of different forms of proximity, we find that once we control for determinants at the node and structural network level, only social proximity remains significant.exponential random graph models, inter-organizational network structure, network analysis, proximity, aviation industry, economic geography

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1977). A dynamic model for social networks.
  2. (2009). A framework for the comparison of maximum pseudo-likelihood and maximum likelihood estimation of exponential family random graph models.
  3. (2008). A statnet tutorial.
  4. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.
  5. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs (with discussion).
  6. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks.
  7. Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks.
  8. (2007). Beyond Dyadic Interdependence.: actor-oriented models for co-evolving soial networks and individual behaviors. 22
  9. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.
  10. Boschma (2009a), Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues.
  11. (2006). Business database. Available on the World Wide Web: Cantner,
  12. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy.
  13. (2001). Corporate Financial Risk Management. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers.
  14. (2010). Deterministic Bayesian inference for the p* model.
  15. (2007). Economic geography and the evolution of networks.
  16. (2003). Effects of the Internet on the spatial structure of innovation networks.
  17. (2007). Exploring biological network structure using exponential random graph models.
  18. (2008). Generating random graphs from a given distribution.
  19. (2008). Goodness of Fit for Social Network Models.
  20. (2003). Heterogeneity Among Displaced Workers,
  21. (2009). in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers.
  22. (2011). Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models.
  23. (1996). International Business; Core Units Are Closed by Fokker.
  24. (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation:
  25. (2006). Interregional Inventor Networks as Studied by Patent Coinventorships.
  26. Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics.
  27. (2007). Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the south of Italy.
  28. (2011). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox.
  29. (2001). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey.
  30. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies.
  31. (1999). Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.
  32. (2010). Manual for SIENA version 3.2. Provisional version.
  33. (2002). Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Exponential Random Graph Models.
  34. (1986). Markov graphs.
  35. (2003). Mobility and Social Networks: Localised Knowledge Spillovers Revisited.
  36. (2009). Model of Genetic Variation in Human Social Networks.
  37. (2003). Mulicollinearity Robust QAP for Multiple Regression. CASOS Working Paper,
  38. (1999). Multilevel Analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.
  39. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences.
  40. (1959). On random graphs.
  41. (2003). Patent Diversity as a Predictor of Regional Innovativeness in Sweden.
  42. (1988). Predicting With Networks: Nonparametric Multiple Regression Analyses of Dyadic Data.
  43. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assesment.
  44. (2011). Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks:
  45. (1987). QAP Partialling as a Test of Spuriousness.
  46. (2006). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks.
  47. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital.
  48. (2007). Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies.
  49. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge:
  50. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis.
  51. Statistical Models for Social Networks: Degeneracy and Inference.
  52. (1996). Stochastic Actor-oriented Models for Network Change.
  53. (2011). The Dynamics of Inventor Networks
  54. (1994). The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives. In: Dodgson
  55. (2010). The evolution of a strategic alliance network – Exploring the case of German stock photography.
  56. (2008). The Fibres that Hold an Innovation Network: An Analysis of Knowledge-Sharing in the Glare Network. In: de
  57. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning andinnovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster.
  58. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry.
  59. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective.
  60. (2001). The statistical evolution of social network dynamics.
  61. (2003). The Structure and Function of Complex Networks.
  62. (2006). Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of'networks' between economic sociology and economic geography.
  63. (2003). Where do small worlds come from?
  64. Your Guide to the Netherlands Aviation Industry, Netherlands Aviation Group.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.