Location of Repository


By Flávio Vilela Vieira and Márcio Holland


The paper aims to investigate on empirical and theoretical grounds the Brazilian exchange rate dynamics under floating exchange rates. The empirical analysis examines the short and long run behavior of exchange rate, interest rate (domestic and foreign) and country risk using econometric techniques such as variance decomposition, Granger causality, cointegration tests, error correction models, and a GARCH model to estimate the exchange rate volatility. The empirical findings suggest that one can argue in favor of a certain degree of endogeneity of the exchange rate and that flexible rates have not been able to insulate the Brazilian economy in the same patterns predicted by the literature due to its own specificities (managed floating with the use of international reserves and domestic interest rates set according to inflation target) and to externally determined variables such as the country risk. Another important outcome is the lack of a closer association of domestic and foreign interest rates since the new exchange regime has been adopted. That is, from January 1999 to May 2004, the US monetary policy has no significant impact on the Brazilian exchange rate dynamics, which has been essentially endogenous primarily when we consider the fiscal dominance expressed by the probability of default.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (2002). A Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation.
  2. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity With Estimates of the Variance of U.K.
  3. (2001). Can Flexible Exchange Rate Still `Work`
  4. (2003). Choosing (and Reneging On) Exchange Rate Regimes.
  5. (2003). Country Risk Endogeneity, Capital Flows and Capital Controls
  6. (1991). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests.
  7. (2003). Evolution and Performance of Exchange Rate Regimes.
  8. (2001). Exchange Rate Policy in Emerging Markets: The Case for Floating. Working Paper,
  9. (2002). Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences.
  10. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? American Economic Review,
  11. (2000). Exchange-rate Policies for Developing Countries: What Have We Learned? What Do We Still Not Know?
  12. (2003). Experience of and Lessons from Exchange Rate Regimes in Emerging Economies.
  13. (2002). Fear of Floating.
  14. (2003). Flexible Exchange Rates as Shock Absorbers.
  15. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.
  16. (2004). Liberalização da Conta de Capital e Fluxos de Portfólio para o Brasil no Período Recente. Fórum BNB de Desenvolvimento.
  17. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration".
  18. (1990). Modelling the Coherence in Short-run Nominal Exchange Rates: a Multivariate Generalized ARCH Approach.
  19. (2000). Monetary Policy Strategies for Latin America. NBER Working Paper 7617,
  20. (1999). No Single Currency Regime is Right for All Countries or at All Times.
  21. (1995). Perspectives on PPP and Long-Run Real Exchange Rates.
  22. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors.
  23. (2003). The Mirage of Exchange Rate Regimes for Emerging Market Countries.
  24. (2004). Times Series. Brasília: DF. http://www.bcb.gov.br CETIP
  25. (2003). Twin Fallacies About Exchange Rate Policy in Emerging Markets.
  26. (2000). Why Do Countries Float the Way they Float? Inter-American Development Bank Working

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.