Location of Repository

We address how the value of risky options should be assessed in the case where the sum of the probability-weighted payoffs is not absolutely convergent and thus dependent on the order in which the terms are summed (e.g., as in the Pasadena Paradox). We develop and partially defend a proposal according to which options should be evaluated on the basis of agreement among admissible (e.g., convex and quasi-symmetric) covering sequences of the constituents of value (i.e., probabilities and payoffs).

OAI identifier:

Provided by:
Research Papers in Economics

- (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications,
- (2010). Decision theory meets the Witch of Agnesi,‖ unpublished draft.
- (1997). Infinite Utility and Finitely Additive Value Theory,‖
- (2003). Intertemporal Equity and the Extension of the Ramsey Criterion,‖
- (2004). Is Evaluative Compositionality a Requirement of Rationality?‖
- (2010). Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set,‖
- (2007). Putting Expectations in Order,‖
- (2008). Relative Expectation Theory,‖
- (2008). Strong and Weak Expectations,‖ Mind 117(467):633-641
- (1965). Von Weizsäcker

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.