Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

"Collaborative R&D in the robot technology in Japan: an inquiry based on patent data analysis (1991-2004)"

By Sebastien Lechevalier, Yukio Ikeda and Junichi Nishimura


The growing trend of collaborative R&D has been well documented recently, both at a global level and through national and industry case studies. However, there is no general agreement on its causes as well as on the motives of the firms collaborating in R&D with other players. The Japanese innovation system (JIS) is no exception. Furthermore, in this case, it is particularly important, because the JIS has been described since the 1970s as dominated by "in-house" R&D by large firms and this feature has been considered as one reason of the limits that the JIS reached at the end of the 1980s. By contrast to the existing literature on collaborative R&D in Japan, this paper focus on the case of the robot technology (RT), by using patent data applied in Japan between 1991 and 2004. The questions we address in this paper are as follows: Did the R&D collaboration in RT increase since the beginning of the 1990s? Did the R&D collaborations lead to higher quality of the outcomes? Is it possible to categorize different forms of collaborations and different types of players (depending on their degree of collaboration)? How to explain the evolution of R&D collaboration, if any? Our results are as follows. First, the level of R&D collaboration in the RT in Japan is overall low and dominated by inter-firm collaborations; but it has increased between 1991 and 2004, especially in the case of collaboration between firms and universities. Second, R&D collaboration has apparently a positive impact on the quality of the patents, but should be more carefully investigated. Third, we find a significant heterogeneity across firms in the practices of collaborations (number of collaborations, choice of partners and "fidelity" with the partners). Fourth, these patterns are tentatively explained by the structural characteristics of the RT (by reference to a transaction cost argument and to the role of science-based technologies) and by firms' capabilities hypothesis; however, it is not possible to clearly identify if one theoretical hypothesis is better supported by the facts.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005b), Industry-University Collaboration and the R&D network of SMEs in Changing Japan’s National Innovation System,
  2. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations,
  3. (1999). An Integrated Network Approach to systems of Innovation – the case of robotics in
  4. (2001). Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in
  5. (2003). Growth Patterns in R&D partnerships: an exploratory statistical study,
  6. (1988). Inside the Robot Kingdom: Japan, Mechatronics and the Coming Robotopia,
  7. (2002). Interfirm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since
  8. (2006). Is There a Significant Contribution of Public Sector
  9. (2006). Japan’s National Innovation System: Rebuilding the Engine of Growth,
  10. (1990). Japanese R&D in robotics and genetic engineering,
  11. New Industry Creation Strategy (in Japanese).
  12. (1996). Of Clusters, hybrids and other strange forms,
  13. (2006). On the Failure of University-Industry Research Collaboration to stimulate High Quality Research
  14. (2004). Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovations with Multiple Indicators,
  15. (2005). Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from Japanese firm level panel data,
  16. (2002). Patents, Citations & Innovations A window on the knowledge economy,
  17. Report on External R&D collaboration Survey,
  18. (2003). Sharing intellectual property rights- an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies,
  19. (2000). Technological paradigm change and the role of university research: the case of the Micromachine and Japanese research universities,
  20. (2004). Toward Expansion of Robot Industry Market and Creation of New Robot Business, Toshiba Review,
  21. (2003). Transaction Costs and Capabilities as Determinants of the R&D boundaries of the firm: A Case
  22. (2005). Which Industries Are Most Science-Based?, RIETI Discussion paper n°2005/03 05-J-009 (in
  23. (2002). Who cooperates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.