Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Dominant Investors and Strategic Transparency

By Enrico C. Perotti and Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden


This paper studies product market competition under a strategic transparency decision. Dominant investors can influence information collection in the financial market, and thereby corporate transparency, by affecting market liquidity or the cost of information collection. More transparency on a firm's competitive position has both strategic advantages and disadvantages: in general, transparency results in higher variability of profits and output. Thus lenders prefer less information revelation through stock market trading, since this protects firms when in a weak competitive position, while equityholders prefer more to make full use of the strategic advantage of a strong firm. We show that bank-controlled firms will tend to discourage trading to reduce price informativeness, while shareholder-run firms prefer more transparency. Our comparitive statics show that bank control may fail to keep firms less transparent as global trading volumes rise.Transparency, Bank control, product market competition

OAI identifier: oai:RePEc:fem:femwpa:1999.24

Suggested articles


  1. (1991). Anil Kashyap and David Scharfstein
  2. (1995). Arm’s Length Finance and Competition in Product Markets: A Welfare Analysis,
  3. (1995). Capital Structure and Product Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from the Supermarket Industry”,
  4. (1988). Capital Structure in Repeated Oligopolies”,
  5. (1985). Cournot Oligopoly with Information Sharing”,
  6. (1998). Economics Analysis of the Japanese Firm”, North Holland,
  7. (1994). Erik and Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden
  8. (1995). Ernst-Ludwig
  9. (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring”,
  10. (1995). Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure,
  11. (1989). Further Evidence on the Bank LendingProcess and the Capital Market Response toBank Loan Agreements”,
  12. (1984). Incentives for Information Production and Disclosure in a Duopolistic Environment”,
  13. (1998). Industrial Competition and Financial System Design”, mimeo,
  14. Innovation and Communication Signalling with Partial Disclosure”,
  15. (1992). Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm’s Length Debt”,
  16. (1996). Kit Pong Wong and Joseph Zechner
  17. (1997). Market Evidence on the Opaqueness of Banking Firms’ Assets”, mimeo,
  18. (1993). Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring”,
  19. (1994). On the Costs of Universal Banking: Evidence from Changing Main Bank Relations in Japan”,
  20. (1995). Ownership Structure as a Determinant of IPO Underpricing: A Theory of the Decision to Go Public for Venture Capital Backed Companies”,
  21. (1985). Price and Quantity Competition in a Di¤erentiated Duopoly”,
  22. (1988). Simultaneous Signalling to the Capital and Product Markets”,
  23. (1987). Some Evidence on the Uniqueness of Bank Loans”,
  24. (1995). TheDecision toGo Public: An Overview”, LSE Financial Group discussion paper no.
  25. (1997). Thierry Foucault and PierreHillion, Microstructure des marchés …nanciers, Paris (France): Presses Universitaires de France,
  26. (1990). Trade Association Disclosure Rules, Incentives to Share Information, and Welfare”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.