Article thumbnail

Optimal Investment Policies for Hybrid Pension Plans - Analyzing the Perspective of Sponsors and Members

By Peter Albrecht, Joachim Coche, Raimond Maurer and Ralph Rogalla

Abstract

This paper analyzes investment strategies in the context of alternative hybrid pension plans which are optimal either from the perspective of the plan sponsor or the beneficiaries. The focus is in particular on how the introduction of minimum and maximum limits for pension benefits as well as minimum guarantees and caps on the return of the members’ individual investment accounts affect the investment decision. The study finds that portfolio choice of sponsor and beneficiaries shows substantial differences depending on the exact plan design and the beneficiaries’ risk aversion. The introduction of caps on investment returns emerged a possible means to reduce such differences and to share investment risks and returns more equally between sponsor and beneficiaries.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1988). Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution Pension Plans: What are the real Tradeoffs?”
  2. (1996). eds., Securing Employer Based Pensions:
  3. (1992). Pension benefit guarantees in the United States; a functional analysis.” In
  4. (1999). The Value of Guarantees on Pension Fund Returns.”
  5. (2000). Valuation of contingent-claims characterizing particular pension schemes.”
  6. (2005). Yield Curve Prediction for the Strategic Investor.” Working Paper, European Central Bank,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.