Location of Repository

Learner-centered social support: enhancing online distance education for underserved rural high school students in the United States

By Julie Keane, Claire de la Varre, Matthew J. Irvin and Wallace Hannum


Over the past decade, federal programs in the United States have largely addressed the well-documented problem of differences in basic access to technology between rural schools and their suburban and urban counterparts. Consequently, rural schools are better able to prepare their students for post-secondary education and the workplace where digital literacy is essential. As technology access improves, online distance education (ODE) is seen as a solution to significant challenges faced by rural schools, including a lack of highly-qualified teachers and declining population. However, ODE has high attrition rates, partly because participants’ social needs are often neglected. Additionally, students' success depends on their abilities to engage in self-regulated learning, effective time management and self-reflection, skills that many high school students are still developing. This paper describes an experimental research study funded by the U.S. Department of Education, currently underway in rural high schools across the U.S. The research adds to a growing body of work that attempts to expand understanding of the digital divide. Increasingly, schools realise that this is no longer an issue of mere access to equipment; education technology projects should incorporate strategies that ensure the success of previously marginalised communities. Our intervention, based on the APA’s Learner- Centered Principles, involves training on-site facilitators to provide social support for students involved in ODE. Preliminary findings indicate that the intervention group has a significantly lower dropout rate

Topics: T Technology (General), L Education (General)
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:435/core5

Suggested articles



  1. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. doi
  2. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. doi
  3. (1997). A m e ric a n P s y c h o lo g ic a l A s s o c ia t io n Wo rk G ro u p o f th e Bo a rd o f Ed u c a tio n A ffa irs
  4. (2006). Analysis of distance education use in rural schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association,
  5. (1997). Association Work Group of the Board of Education Affairs
  6. (2002). B e lc a s tro , F .
  7. (2004). B e rn a rd doi
  8. (2006). Breaking the Fall: Cushioning the Impact of Rural Declining Enrollment.
  9. (2006). Bridging the Community Along: A Case Study
  10. (2007). C o m b s , doi
  11. (2005). C o m b s , B .L . & Va k il i, D . doi
  12. (1991). D e c i, E.L .& Ry a n doi
  13. (2006). e rs o n , L
  14. (2002). Electronic Technology and its Use with Rural Gifted Students. Roeper Review doi
  15. (2002). Experimental effects of online instruction on locus of control.
  16. (2000). Go o c h , doi
  17. (2006). H a n n u m , W . Fa r m e r , T . Ve a l, W .R . B a rb e r ,
  18. (2004). H o b b s doi
  19. (2003). How are rural districts meeting the teacher quality requirements of No Child Left Behind?
  20. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. doi
  21. (2003). How Well Are Americans Students Learning? With specials sections on homework, charter schools, and rural school achievement. Washington D.C: The Brookings Institute.
  22. (2003). Identifying predictors of academic persistence in distance education.
  23. (2003). L a n d , D., Nw a d e i, A. , S tu f fle b e a m , S., Ola k a ,
  24. (2002). L a v e l le , E . & An d r is doi
  25. (2003). L o v e le s s , T doi
  26. (2007). Learner-centered classroom practices and assessments: maximizing student motivation, learning and achievement. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks,
  27. (2003). Leaving Rural Children Behind. Education Week,
  28. (1991). Motivation and education: The self determination perspective. doi
  29. (2005). N a tio n a l C e n te r fo r E d u c a tio n S ta t is t ic s (2007). The NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) Survey, Local Education Agency Universe Survey,
  30. (2006). o n s o n , M ., Sma ld in o , S ., A lb r ig h
  31. (2003). P a rk e r, A . doi
  32. (2004). p s o n , O ., doi
  33. (2005). ra l S c h o o l a n d Co m m u n ity T ru s t .
  34. (2008). Research Proceedings Learner-centered social support K irb y , E. & D ris c o l l,
  35. (2006). S c h a ft, K .A . A l th e r , T . an d B rid g e r ,
  36. (2004). S tu h lm a n , M.
  37. (2003). S w a rtz b e c k , T .D ., P r in c e , C . Re d fie ld ,
  38. (2003). Socio-technical system advancements: making distance learning changes that count.
  39. (2001). Supporting primary students’ online learning in virtual enrichment program. doi
  40. (2003). T o m p k in s doi
  41. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. doi
  42. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of online education (3rd ed.) Pearson: Upper Saddle River, doi
  43. (2005). The Ecology of Children’s Computing. Paper Presented at the American Education Research Association:
  44. (2004). The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning. doi
  45. (2004). The promise and the power of online learning in rural education. Rural School and Community Trust:
  46. (2000). Today’s fad or tomorrow’s future? Retrieved
  47. (2005). Why rural matters 2005: The facts about rural education in 50 states.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.