Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Optimal modal spacing and density for\ud critical listening

By Bruno Fazenda and Matthew Wankling


This paper presents a study on the subjective effects of modal spacing and density. These are measures often used as\ud indicators to define particular aspect ratios and source positions to avoid low frequency reproduction problems in\ud rooms. These indicators imply a given modal spacing leading to a supposedly less problematic response for the\ud listener. An investigation into this topic shows that subjects can identify an optimal spacing between two resonances\ud associated with a reduction of the overall decay. Further work to define a subjective counterpart to the Schroeder\ud Frequency has revealed that an increase in density may not always lead to an improvement, as interaction between\ud mode-shapes results in serious degradation of the stimulus, which is detectable by listeners

Topics: TA, QC
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1981). A New Criterion for the Distribution of Normal Room
  2. (1956). A redetermination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones,” doi
  3. (1985). A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria doi
  4. (1997). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing,
  5. (1971). Dimension-Ratios of Rectangular Rooms with Good Distribution
  6. (2008). Fazenda and Wankling Optimal Modal Spacing and Density
  7. (2006). Loudspeakers and Rooms for Sound Reproduction—A Scientific Review,” doi
  8. (2006). Modulation transfer function as a measure of room low frequency performance,”
  9. (1939). Normal Modes of Vibration in Room Acoustics: Angular Distribution Theory,” doi
  10. (2005). Perception of Modal Distribution Metrics in Critical Listening Spaces-Dependence on Room Aspect Ratios,”
  11. (1983). PEST reduces bias in forced choice psychophysics,” doi
  12. (1967). PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions,” doi
  13. (2004). Room Sizing and Optimization at Low Frequencies,”
  14. (2008). Source Placement for Equalization in doi
  15. (2006). Subjective assessment of the modulation transfer function as a means for quantifying low-frequency sound quality,”
  16. (1996). The ``Schroeder Frequency'' doi
  17. (2007). Thresholds of detection for changes to the Q factor of low-frequency modes in listening environments,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.