Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Infrastructure for web services that perform automated reasoning

By Amir Araghi

Abstract

Despite much research into Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intelligent Agents (IA) over the past few\ud years little 'intelligent' behaviour is displayed by modern computer systems. AI planning and intelligent\ud systems are failing to be generally used. The intellectual abilities such as learning, analysing, problem\ud solving, planning and abstracting are features that we do not entirely associate with today’s computer\ud systems.\ud \ud \ud In AI we recognise that although machines are beginning to overtake the human brain in terms of\ud sheer processing power and perhaps storage capacity, they still cannot approach the level of human\ud intelligence in terms of general purpose cognitive capability. Part of the reason for this is that software\ud technology that supports general intelligent processes is difficult to use, understand and maintain.\ud \ud \ud With the advent of the Internet, the Web as we know it is an enormous collection of information stored\ud in a variety of formats and held loosely together by hyperlinks. This is adequate for humans who are\ud able to understand natural languages, but it is of no use if we want machines to be able to process as\ud well as understand the information. To deal with this issue, the next Web generation promise to deliver\ud Semantic Web Services; services that are self-described and amenable to automated discovery,\ud composition and choreography. They can be utilised by application or other services without human\ud assistant or protocols; where information is encoded according to well defined vocabularies, often\ud known as Ontologies. In this research, we aim to create the infrastructure to enable intelligent software\ud to be recast as semantic web services, and lead the way to “Service Oriented Intelligence” –\ud distributed software intelligence using the Internet

Topics: T1, QA75, QA76
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:3802

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). [W3C] The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL (Web Ontology Language). Accessed doi
  2. (2006). [W3C] The World Wide Web Consortium. RDF (Resource Description Framework), Accessed
  3. (2006). [W3C] The World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Web. Accessed doi
  4. (2006). [W3C] The World Wide Web Consortium. Web Ontology Language Overview, Accessed doi
  5. (2006). [W3C] The World Wide Web Consortium. Web Service Architecture, Accessed doi
  6. (2004). A PDDL Based Tool for Automatic Web Service Composition”, doi
  7. (2004). A Survey of Automated Web Service Composition Methods.” doi
  8. (2005). Developing Semantic Web Services”, A K Peters press,
  9. (2006). Encyclopaedia. “Closer World Assumption definition”, Accessed
  10. (2006). Encyclopaedia. “Open World Assumption definition”, Accessed
  11. (2005). Laboratories, “A Semantic Web Services Architecture”,
  12. (2006). of Huddersfield. GIPO (Graphical Interface for Planning with Objects). http://scom.hud.ac.uk/planform/gipo>. Accessed
  13. (2006). OWL-S 1.0. Accessed doi
  14. (2004). Planning for Semantic Web Services”, doi
  15. (2003). Quality Driven Web Services Composition.” doi
  16. (2001). Semantic Web Services.” doi
  17. (2003). Semi-automatic Composition of Web Services using Semantic Description”, doi
  18. (2006). The Guide to Computing Literature. AI planning: systems and techniques. Accessed
  19. (2002). The Web Service Modelling Framework WSMF”, doi
  20. (2002). Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng, “The Semantic Web: Semantic Web Services”, doi
  21. (2003). Web Service Composition - Current Solutions and
  22. (2003). Web Service composition as planning”.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.