Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Grouping of decathlon disciplines

By Anne Woolf, Les Ansley and Penelope Bidgood

Abstract

The 10 disciplines in the decathlon can be broadly characterised as running, jumping and throwing. However, these simplistic characteristics may not represent the groupings defined by performances in the decathlon. The identification of groups may reveal a recondite advantage for athletes who excel in particular disciplines. Therefore this study used cluster analysis to determine the groupings inherent within the decathlon disciplines. The data set was derived from the top 173 decathletes between the years 1986 to 2005. Six clustering methods were applied to a Euclidean proximity matrix. The highest number of clusters common to all the methods was accepted as the solution. All six methods produced the same 3-cluster ([100m 400m 110H LJ PV HJ][SP DT JT][1500m]), 4-cluster ([100m 400m 110H LJ PV][SP DT JT][HJ][1500m]) and 5-cluster ([100m 400m 110mH LJ][SP DT JT][PV][HJ][1500m]) solutions. Stability tests confirmed the consistency of all the solutions. The 10 disciplines of the decathlon form into five groupings, which can be adequately explained from a physiological perspective. The clustering suggests that athletes who perform better at the sprint/track disciplines may obtain an advantage in the decathlon

Topics: C600
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:504

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). An analysis of decathlon data. doi
  2. (2007). Brought to you by | doi
  3. (1949). Champion Technique in Track and Field (2 nd ed).
  4. (1980). Dynamics of the pole vault. doi
  5. (2002). Evolutionary biology: Performance constraints in decathletes. doi
  6. (1988). Vertical and radial motions of the body during the take-off phase of high jumping. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.