Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On Imagining Others Lives Within Narrative Research: Some Constraints and Possibilities

By Brett Smith and Victor Pérez-Samaniego

Abstract

According to Andrews (2007), “if we wish to access the frameworks of meaning for others, we must be willing and able to imagine a world other than the one we know” (p.489). This may be enabled, she suggests, through narrative imagination.\ud Our narrative imagination is our most valuable tool in our exploration of others’ worlds, for it assists us in seeing beyond the immediately visible. It is our ability to imagine other “possible lives” (Brockmeier, 2005) – our own and others – that creates our bond with “diverse social and historical worlds” (Brockmeier, 2005). Without this imagination, we are forever restricted to the world as we know it, which is a very limited place to be. (p.510)\ud Furthermore, for Bondi (2003) and Finley (2006), through imaginatively entering into the experiential world of participant’s lives researchers may increase their ability to better know them, experience empathy, reduce emotional harm, and thereby help them obtain significant knowledge of the human situation in ethically admirable, or at least ethically defensible, ways. Likewise, Mackenzie and Scully (2007) point out that it is often assumed that we can overcome epistemic gaps through the exercise of moral imagination: “By imaginatively ‘putting ourselves in the place of others’, it is argued, we can come to understand the experiences and points of view of others whose lives are quite different from our own” (p.337).\ud In what follows, drawing on various scholars, including Levinas (2001), I seek to problematise this sense of imaginative projection by highlighting a number of constraints to our ability to imagine a world other than the one we know. Before this, however, it must first be recognised that I am not suggesting that we should abandon trying to imagine others lives. On the contrary, this process can be a “valuable tool in our exploration of others’ worlds” (Andrews, 2007, p.510). Nevertheless, there are constraints to the imagining the worlds of other people that need highlighting. Here, without wishing to devalue what imagination offers, I wish to draw attention to two constraints: the body and otherness. My modest aspiration is to offer a caution against overstating the power of imagination within narrative research

Topics: BF
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:4870

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). Against empathy voice and authenticity,
  2. (2008). Changing bodies, changing narratives and the consequences of tellability: A case study of becoming disabled through sport, doi
  3. (2006). Dancing between embodied empathy and phenomenological reflection, doi
  4. (2003). Empathy and identification: Conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork,
  5. (1998). Entre Nous: Thinking-of-the-Other, Translated doi
  6. (2007). Exploring cross-cultural boundaries, doi
  7. (2005). Generosity, care, and a narrative interest in pain,
  8. (2001). Is it righteous to be?: Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas, Edited by J. doi
  9. (2005). Men, sport, spinal cord injury, and narratives of hope, doi
  10. (2007). Moral imagination, disability and embodiment, doi
  11. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics, Translated and edited by C. doi
  12. (2004). The renewal of generosity, doi
  13. (1995). The wounded storyteller, doi
  14. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions, Cambridge: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.