Location of Repository

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [journal article as teaching resource, deposited by John Flynn]

By Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson, Jonathan J. Deeks and Douglas G. Altman


Paper from the BMJ by Higgins J. P. T. et al\ud Cochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the\ud consistency of the results of studies in meta-analyses. What does this new quantity mean, and why is\ud assessment of heterogeneity so important to clinical practice

Topics: G311 Medical Statistics, G310 Applied Statistics
Publisher: BMJ
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:1932

Suggested articles



  1. 15 Sterne JAC,Bradburn MJ,Egger M.Meta-analysis
  2. 20 Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. doi
  3. 21 Engels EA,Schmid CH,Terrin N,Olkin I,Lau J.Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. doi
  4. 22 Deeks JJ.Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. doi
  5. (2002). Amantadine and rimantadine for preventing and treating influenza A in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi
  6. Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis. doi
  7. (2003). bmj.com on 5 doi
  8. (1998). Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. doi
  9. (1992). Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. doi
  10. (1998). Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. doi
  11. for the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Grading Review Group. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. doi
  12. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. doi
  13. Meta-analysis: potentials and promise. doi
  14. Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science. Epidemiol Rev 1992;14:154-76. 13 Barbui
  15. Misleading meta-analysis. doi
  16. Moving from evidence to action. In: Guyatt
  17. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis.
  18. (1999). Residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and childhood leukaemia: a meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ
  19. (1992). Small sample performance of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in k 2Ă—2 tables. doi
  20. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. doi
  21. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. doi
  22. The combination of estimates from different experiments. doi
  23. The performance of the two-stage analysis of twotreatment, two-period crossover trials. doi
  24. Which guidelines can we trust? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.