Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Predicting the movements of permanently installed electrodes on an active landslide using time-lapse geoelectrical resistivity data only

By Paul B. Wilkinson, Jonathan E. Chambers, Philip I. Meldrum, David A. Gunn, Richard D. Ogilvy and Oliver Kuras

Abstract

If electrodes move during geoelectrical resistivity monitoring and their new positions are not incorporated in the inversion, then the resulting tomographic images exhibit artefacts that can obscure genuine time-lapse resistivity changes in the subsurface. The effects of electrode movements on time-lapse resistivity tomography are investigated using a simple analytical model and real data. The correspondence between the model and the data is sufficiently good to be able to predict the effects of electrode movements with reasonable accuracy. For the linear electrode arrays and 2D inversions under consideration, the data are much more sensitive to longitudinal than transverse or vertical movements. Consequently the model can be used to invert the longitudinal offsets of the electrodes from their known baseline positions using only the time-lapse ratios of the apparent resistivity data. The example datasets are taken from a permanently installed electrode array on an active lobe of a landslide. Using two sets with different levels of noise and subsurface resistivity changes, it is found that the electrode positions can be recovered to an accuracy of 4 % of the baseline electrode spacing. This is sufficient to correct the artefacts in the resistivity images, and provides for the possibility of monitoring the movement of the landslide and its internal hydraulic processes simultaneously using electrical resistivity tomography only

Topics: Earth Sciences, Physics, Mathematics
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04760.x
OAI identifier: oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:12427

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). 2D electrical resistivity imaging of some complex landslides in the Lucanian Apennine chain, southern Italy,
  2. (2003). A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2-D electrical imaging surveys,
  3. (2008). A complex geoscientific strategy for landslide hazard mitigation – from airborne mapping to ground monitoring,
  4. (2005). Application of geophysical methods for the investigation of the large gravitational mass movement of Sechilienne,
  5. (2009). Automated monitoring of coastal aquifers with electrical resistivity tomography,
  6. (2007). Characterization of an internal slope movement structure by hydrogeophysical surveying,
  7. (2008). Comparison of GPR, 2D-resistivity and traditional techniques for the subsurface exploration of the Öschingen landslide, Swabian Alb (Germany),
  8. (1989). Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays,
  9. (2008). Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement,
  10. (2005). EIT images of ventilation: what contributes to the resistivity changes?, doi
  11. (2001). Electrical imaging at the large block test—Yucca Mountain,
  12. (1998). Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations,
  13. (2005). Electrical Methods, In: Hydrogeophysics by Rubin &
  14. (2009). Electrical resistivity tomography and statistical analysis in landslide modelling: A conceptual approach,
  15. (2008). Extreme sensitivity of crosshole electrical resistivity tomography measurements to geometric errors, doi
  16. (2007). Geophysical investigation of landslides : a review,
  17. (2005). Geophysical survey to estimate the 3D sliding surface and the 4D evolution of the water pressure on part of a deep seated landslide,
  18. (2001). Groundwater flow after heavy rain in landslide-slope area from 2-D inversion of resistivity monitoring data, doi
  19. (2004). High-resolution electrical imaging of the Varco d’Izzo earthflow (southern Italy),
  20. (2009). Hydrogeophysical monitoring of landslide processes using automated time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ALERT),
  21. (2006). Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT,
  22. (2008). Integrated geophysical and geomorphological approach to investigate the snowmelttriggered landslide of Bosco Piccolo village (Basilicata,
  23. (1997). Introduction to ground surface self-potential tomography,
  24. (2006). Investigation of a slope endangered by rainfall-induced landslides using 3D resistivity tomography and geotechnical testing,
  25. (1996). Landslide types and processes.
  26. (2007). Low temperature dependence of electrical resistivity: Implications for near surface geophysical monitoring,
  27. (2009). Monitoring hydraulic processes with automated timelapse electrical resistivity tomography (ALERT),
  28. (2005). Noniterative algorithms for electrical resistivity imaging applied to subsurface local anomalies,
  29. (1992). Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn,
  30. (2003). Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying, doi
  31. (1988). Reciprocity theorems in geoelectric and geoelectromagnetic work,
  32. (2008). Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences,
  33. (2005). Sensitivity of electrical resistivity tomography data to electrode position errors,
  34. (2009). Statistical analysis of the Time Lapse Electrical Resistivity Tomography of the “Vence landslide” as a tool for prediction of landslide triggering,
  35. (1999). The effect of terrain topography on commonly used resistivity arrays, doi
  36. (1942). The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, Petroleum Trans.
  37. (1983). York solid and drift

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.