Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Methodological issues arising from research into the emergence of enterprise in the creative industries

By Lorraine Warren and Ted Fuller


In the digital economy, the creative industries revolve around dynamic, innovative and often unorthodox collaborations between individuals and organisations. Large, small and micro-businesses often come together for the duration of a project, then disband and form new partnerships for the next project. During such projects, novelty emerges in the form of new products, services, business models or patterns of consumer/producer behaviour. The structure of novelty-creating practices, i.e. the interactions within one-off dynamic project groups is not well understood. Firstly, it spans multiple levels of analysis (individuals, groups, organisations, society); secondly, creativity in the digital domain often has unpredictable outcomes as the availability and potential of technology changes so rapidly. This presents a challenge for research design. Latterly, we have undertaken a stream of research that utilises the theoretical field of entrepreneurship to study the emergence of novelty. Here we extend that work by presenting a conceptual framework that we suggest can capture how novelty emerges over time. Methodologically, we suggest that the framework has analytical potential too, in that it could be used to support effectively the collection of data: ordering and categorising empirical observations concerning how different phenomena emerge over time across multiple levels of analysis and contexts

Topics: N100 Business studies, N200 Management studies
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000c), Self-organized transitions: A pattern amid the chaos of transformative change, doi
  2. (2006a), Entrepreneurship as foresight: A complex social network perspective on organisational foresight, Futures, doi
  3. (2008). A complexity perspective on entrepreneurship: a new methodology for research in high velocity environments, paper accepted for British Academy of Management conference,
  4. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, doi
  5. (2007). Capitalising Creativity Developing earned income streams in Cultural Industries organisations, Cultural Snapshot No 14,, accesses 30/08/2008
  6. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self awareness, doi
  7. (2006). Complex Explanations of Order Creation, Emergence and Sustainability as Situated Entrepreneurship doi
  8. (2002). Complexity and management, Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?, doi
  9. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship, doi
  10. (2005). Complexity theories and Organisational Change, doi
  11. (2005). Complexity theory and strategic change: an empirically informed critique, doi
  12. (2006). Conceptualising Entrepreneurship in a Transition Context, doi
  13. (2002). Creative and cultural industries – An economic impact study for South East England Research report by David Powell Associates Ltd., for South East England Cultural Consortium and the South East England Development Agency Sarasvathy,
  14. (2000). Creative Industries, Contracts between arts and commerce, doi
  15. Emergence as a process of self-organizing - New assumptions and insights from the study of non-linear dynamic systems, doi
  16. (2004). Entrepreneurial foresight; a case study in reflexivity, experiments, sensitivity and reorganisation,
  17. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity, doi
  18. (2007). Entrepreneuring' as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies, doi
  19. (2003). Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions, doi
  20. Generative Knowledge and Self-Organized Learning Reflecting on Don Schön’s Research, doi
  21. (2005). High technology clustering through spinout and attraction: the Cambridge case, doi
  22. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective, doi
  23. (2004). Introduction: Entrepreneurship theory: possibilities and future directions, doi
  24. (2001). Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future, Entrepreneurship: Theory doi
  25. (2001). Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the doi
  26. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation, doi
  27. (2000). Moving beyond metaphor: towards a methodology for grounding complexity in small business and entrepreneurship research, Emergence;
  28. (2006). Narratives of Enterprise: crafting entrepreneurial self-identity in a small firm, doi
  29. (1997). Of chaos and complexity: managerial insights from a new science, doi
  30. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: doi
  31. (2001). Small enterprises as complex adaptive systems: a methodological question?, doi
  32. (2005). Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems, Cambridge: doi
  33. (2007). Staying ahead: the economic performance of the UK's creative industries.
  34. (2001). Studying Organisational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research, doi
  35. (2007). Sustaining entrepreneurial business; a complexity perspective on processes that produce emergent practice, doi
  36. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process, doi
  37. (2006). The Emergence of A study of Corporate Entrepreneurship, paper presented at Babson-Kauffman Enterpreneurship Research Conference,
  38. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, doi
  39. (1997). The Role of Socially Constructed Temporal Perspectives in the Emergence of Rapid Growth Firms, Entrepreneurship: Theory &
  40. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle Cambridge, Mass:
  41. (2004). Towards a complexity science of entrepreneurship, doi
  42. (1993). Words lead to Deeds: Towards an Organizational Emergence Vocabulary, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.