Sales and consumption of refrigerated processed foods of extended durability (REPFEDs) have increased many-fold in
Europe over the last 10 years. The safety and quality of these convenient ready-to-eat foods relies on a combination of mild heat
treatment and refrigerated storage, sometimes in combination with other hurdles such as mild preservative factors. The major
hazard to the microbiological safety of these foods is Clostridium botulinum. This paper reports on the prevalence and
behaviour of proteolytic C. botulinum and non-proteolytic C. botulinum in gnocchi, a potato-based REPFED of Italian origin.
Attempts to isolate proteolytic C. botulinum and non-proteolytic C. botulinum from gnocchi and its ingredients were
unsuccessful. Based on assessment of the adequacy of the methods used, it was estimated that for proteolytic C. botulinum there
was < 25 spores/kg of gnocchi and < 70 spores/kg of ingredients. The total anaerobic microbial load of gnocchi and its
ingredients was low, with an estimated 1 MPN/g in processed gnocchi. Most of the anaerobic flora was facultatively anaerobic.
A few obligately anaerobic bacteria were isolated from gnocchi and its ingredients and belonged to different Clostridium
species.
The protection factor, number of decimal reductions in the probability of toxigenesis from a single spore, was determined for
eight different gnocchi formulations by challenge test studies. For all gnocchi stored at 8 jC (as recommended by the
manufacturer) or 12 jC (mild temperature abuse), growth and toxin production were not detected in 75 days. The protection
factor was >4.2 for proteolytic C. botulinum, and >6.2 for non-proteolytic C. botulinum. When inoculated packs were stored at
20 jC (severe temperature abuse), toxin production in 75 days was prevented by the inclusion of 0.09% (w/w) sorbic acid
(protection factors as above), however in the absence of sorbic acid the packs became toxic before the end of the intended shelflife
and the protection factors were lower. Providing sorbic acid (0.09% w/w) is included in the gnocchi, the safety margin
would seem to be very large with respect to the foodborne botulism hazard
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.