Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The challenges of assessing evidence of practice learning (from an English perspective)

By Karin Crawford

Abstract

This paper discusses the complexities of evidencing and assessing work-based learning, within educational, professional programmes at post-qualifying levels. \ud \ud Through an exploration of how learning takes place in practice situations and the most commonly used method of evidence collection and assessment, portfolio-building, the paper debates the principles, rationale and characteristics underpinning assessment of practice in health and social care. The author concludes that there are two aspects of evidence collection and its assessment that must be clarified. One aspect being that the objectives of collecting evidence need to be understood by all stakeholders, particularly in respect of the interface between professional regulation and professional development. The second aspect relates to the format and focus of the assessment strategy. The paper offers a framework for understanding the nature and purpose of evidence collection and its place in the assessment of practice in the context of post-qualifying continuing professional education.\ud \ud The author’s objective is that this paper and the analytical model proposed, should contribute to the professional knowledge-base about ‘practical experiences in professional education’ by raising awareness and debate about how professional post-qualifying education and learning in practice is evidenced and assessed

Topics: L500 Social Work, X990 Education not elsewhere classified
Publisher: University of Auckland
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:3231

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). Assessing health professionals. doi
  2. (2002). Continuing professional development after qualification – partnerships, pitfalls and potential. doi
  3. (2002). Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussions between assessors. doi
  4. (2002). Enhancing reliability in portfolioassessment: discussions between assessors. doi
  5. (1984). Experiential Learning doi
  6. (2002). From Technical Rationality to reflection-in-action. In
  7. (2004). Portfolios for Learning and Assessment. Higher Education Academy www.heacademy.ac.uk
  8. (2005). Quality issues in judging portfolios: implications for organizing teaching portfolio assessment procedures. doi
  9. (1997). Report of the National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education London: HMSO Department for Education and Employment (DfEE).
  10. (2004). Supporting Lifelong Learning Volume 1, Perspectives on Learning.(pp. 146-162) London: RoutledgeFalmer doi
  11. (1995). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. doi
  12. (2002). The Reliability of Assessment by doi
  13. (2000). The Use of Portfolios in the Assessment of Learning and Competence. doi
  14. (2002). Work-based Learning in Health: evaluating the experience of learners, community agencies and teachers. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.