Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Objective Measurement of Music Quality Using Inter-Band Relationship Analysis

By Steven Fenton, Jonathan P. Wakefield and Bruno Fazenda

Abstract

This paper describes and evaluates an objective measurement that grades the quality of a complex musical signal. The authors have previously identified a potential correlation between inter-band dynamics and the subjective quality of produced music excerpts. This paper describes the previously presented Inter-Band Relationship (IBR) descriptor and extends this work by conducting more thorough testing with real-world music excerpts and a greater number of listening subjects. A high degree of correlation is observed between the Mean Subject Scores (MSS) and the objective IBR descriptor suggesting it could be used as an additional model output variable (MOV) to describe produced music quality. The method lends itself to real-time implementation and therefore can be exploited within mixing, mastering and monitoring tools

Topics: M1, TA, TK
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:9851

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Algorithms to measure audio programme loudness and true-peak audio level,
  2. (2010). C.Danner, ”Measuring Dynamics: Comparing and Contrasting Algorithms for the Computation of Dynamic Range”
  3. Cascaded audio coding,
  4. (2010). E.Schubert “ Comparing continuous subjective loudness responses and computational models of loudness for temporally varying sounds”, 129th Convention, Convention Paper 8177, Audio Engineering Society,San Francisco,
  5. (2008). Edouard-Leon Scott de
  6. F.Kozamernik, EBU listening tests on internet audio codecs, EBU
  7. (2008). F.Rumsey, On some biases encountered in modern audio quality listening testsA doi
  8. (2009). Foundation,
  9. General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality International Telecommunications
  10. (2006). information document for digital audio – Personal computer audio quality measurements, Audio Engineering
  11. (2011). information document for digital audio – Personal computer audio quality measurements, Audio Engineering Society, Inc,
  12. (1998). Method for objective measurement of perceived audio quality’,
  13. (2003). Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems,
  14. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality,
  15. Methods for the subjective assessment of audio systems including multichannel sound systems,
  16. (2006). N.Zacharov, Perceptual audio evaluation, theory, method and application, J.Wiley, doi
  17. (2009). Objective Quality Measurement of Audio Using Dynamic Range Analysis,
  18. (2008). Roughometer": Realtime Roughness Calculation and Profiling 125th Convention, Convention Paper 7516, Audio Engineering Society,San Francisco,
  19. (2004). S.H.Nielsen, Evaluation of Different Loudness Models with Music and Speech Material 117th Convention,
  20. Sound Quality Assessment Material, Recordings for subjective tests
  21. (2008). T.Lund, Loudness descriptors to characterize programs and music tracks,
  22. (2009). Up,
  23. (2003). Why Are Commercials so Loud? -- Perception and Modeling of the Loudness of AmplitudeCompressed Speech",

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.