Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Costly sexual harassment in a beetle

By Gay Laurene, Paul Eady, Ram Vasudev, David J. Hosken and Tom Tregenza


The optimal number of mating partners for females rarely coincides with\ud that for males, leading to sexual conflict over mating frequency. In the bruchid beetle\ud Callosobruchus maculatus , the fitness consequences to females of engaging in\ud multiple copulations are complex, with studies demonstrating both costs and benefits\ud to multiple mating. However, females kept continuously with males have a lower\ud lifetime egg production compared with females mated only once and then isolated\ud from males. This reduction in fitness may be a result of damage caused by male\ud genitalia, which bear spines that puncture the female‘s reproductive tract, and/or\ud toxic elements in the ejaculate. However, male harassment rather than costs of\ud matings themselves could also explain the results. In the present study, the fitness\ud costs of male harassment for female C. maculatus are estimated. The natural refractory\ud period of females immediately after their first mating is used to separate the cost of\ud harassment from the cost of mating. Male harassment results in females laying fewer\ud eggs and this results in a tendency to produce fewer offspring. The results are\ud discussed in the context of mate choice and sexual selection

Topics: C142 Reproductive Biology, C182 Evolution, C100 Biology
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00656.x
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.