Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

For or against compulsory voting in Britain and Belgium

By Jacqui Briggs and Karen Chellis


In the UK and in Belgium there is a debate regarding compulsory voting. Belgium has had compulsory voting in place since 1893 but recently some commentators would wish to change this situation. In part, these voices are motivated by the fear of the rise of the right. In Britain, on the contrary, there are those who would wish to see the introduction of compulsory voting – their main argument being the low turnout in recent elections. Starting from the literature on compulsory voting, this article analyses the key arguments that are present in contemporary debates surrounding compulsory voting in both countries. The article deals with the effects regarding the political strength of parties, the overall turnout and the turnout of specific socio-demographic groups in society. We also question prominent politicians in Belgium and the United Kingdom concerning their views on the importance of the major arguments in contemporary politics for and against compulsory voting; namely, democratic values such as freedom, citizenship and equality, voicing the will of the people, legitimacy of representative institutions, education and information, and the financial aspects. By doing so, the article assesses the key arguments in the debate regarding maintaining or changing the status quo concerning compulsory voting in Britain and Belgium. Our findings indicate that matters of legitimacy of the democratic institutions and voting as a civic duty would be the main features of eventual debates concerning introducing or abolishing compulsory voting

Topics: L243 Politics of a specific country/region, L410 UK Social Policy, L420 International Social Policy, L200 Politics, L400 Social Policy
Publisher: University of Plymouth Press
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). (s.d.) “Compulsory Voting”, To appear in the International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, doi
  2. (s.d.) De stemplicht is een zinloze vrijheidsbeperking,
  3. (2006). A Citizen’s Duty: Voter inequality and the case for compulsory turnout, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
  4. (2001). A great leveller: compulsory voting”,
  5. (1997). Afschaffing van de kiesplicht. Een simulatie”,
  6. (1996). Compulsory Voting and Perceptions of Parliament”,
  7. (2006). Compulsory Voting Around the World, London: the Electoral Commission.
  8. (2004). Compulsory Voting in Australia: A basis for a “best practice” regime”,
  9. (2005). Compulsory Voting in Australia: Turnout with and without it”, doi
  10. (2005). Compulsory Voting in Australian National Elections,
  11. (2005). Compulsory Voting in Australian National Elections, Canberra: Parliamentary Library: Parliament of Australia.
  12. (1998). Compulsory Voting in Belgium: an application of the Lijphart Thesis”,
  13. (1974). Compulsory Voting Legislation: Impact on Voter Turnout in the Netherlands”,
  14. (1955). Compulsory Voting,
  15. (1995). Compulsory Voting, Invalid Ballots, doi
  16. (1995). Compulsory Voting, Invalid Ballots, and Abstention in Brazil”, doi
  17. (2003). Compulsory Voting, London: House of Commons Library.
  18. (1996). Compulsory Voting, Party Stability and Electoral Bias in Australia. Paper presented to the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association,
  19. (1996). Compulsory Voting, Party Stability Soc & doi
  20. (1986). Compulsory Voting, Turnout and Party Advantage in doi
  21. (1986). Compulsory Voting, Turnout and Party Advantage in Australia”, doi
  22. (1995). Compulsory Voting:
  23. (2002). Compulsory Voting: Residual problems and Potential Solutions”, doi
  24. (1924). Compulsory Voting: What it is and How it works, Fabian Tract Number 209,
  25. (2005). De opkomstplicht in Vlaanderen, Burger, bestuur en beleid?”, Tijdschrift voor bestuurskunde en bestuursrecht,
  26. (2006). Democracy and Voting,
  27. (2004). Democracy is dying: we must be forced to vote”,
  28. (1986). Differential Turnout and Party Advantage doi
  29. (1998). Does Compulsory Voting Distort Electoral Outcomes”,
  30. (2007). Elections and Voters doi
  31. (1999). Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting?”, doi
  32. (2002). Electoral Systems and Women‟s Representation: A Long-Term Perspective”, doi
  33. (2005). Hoon calls for compulsory voting”,
  34. (2005). Mending the relationship between citizens and Westminster”, Key Note speech,
  35. (2002). On the Reasonableness of Compelling Citizens to “Vote”: the Australian Case”, doi
  36. (2002). Opkomstplicht of vrijheid om al of niet te gaan stemmen in Vlaanderen: het verkiezingsonderzoek van 1999, In: De kiezer heeft zijn redenen. 13 juni en de politieke opvattingen van de Vlamingen,
  37. (2001). Opkomstplicht of vrijheid om al of niet te gaan stemmen” ISPOBulletin 2001/4: pkomstplicht%20of%20vrijheid%22 of 21/8/2006
  38. (2001). Opkomstplicht of vrijheid om al of niet te gaan stemmen”, ISPO-Bulletin 2001/4: mstplicht%20of%20vrijheid%22 of 21/8/2006
  39. (2006). Over de (on-)zin van de opkomstplicht op lokaal Vlak”, Samenleving en Politiek,
  40. (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison. Cambridge: doi
  41. (1992). Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, doi
  42. (1994). The case against compulsory voting”,
  43. (1994). The Impact of Mandatory Voting Laws on Turnout: A QuasiExperimental Approach”, doi
  44. (2006). The Power Inquiry doi
  45. (2005). This Strangulation of Dreams is Creating a Phantom Party”,
  46. (2004). Turning Out or Turning Off? An analysis of political disengagement and what can be done about it, London: Electoral Reform Society.
  47. (1995). Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis”, doi
  48. (2005). Turnout is really about class”,
  49. (1997). Unequal Participation: Democracy‟s Unresolved Dilemma”, doi
  50. (1988). Voter Turnout in doi
  51. (2000). Votes for All, London, The Fabian Society.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.