Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Children's sensitivity to their own relative ignorance : handling of possibilities under epistemic and physical uncertainty

By Elizabeth J. Robinson, M. J. Rowley, S. R. Beck, D. J. Carroll and Ian Apperly

Abstract

Children were more likely correctly to specify possibilities when uncertainty resided in the physical world, and more likely to guess the outcome when objectively identical uncertainty arose from their own perspective of ignorance (epistemic uncertainty). In Experiment 1, 4-to 6-year-olds more frequently marked both doors from which a block might emerge when the outcome was undetermined, than when the block was hidden behind one door. In Experiment 2 (5-to 6- year-olds) and 3 (5-to 8- yearolds), children more frequently placed food in both possible locations when an imaginary pet was yet to be placed in a box, than when it was hidden in one. Results have implications for interpretive theory of mind and ‘curse of knowledge’

Topics: BF
Publisher: Blackwell-synergy
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00964.x
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:43

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). Acquiring a conception of mind: A review of psychological research and theory. doi
  2. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. doi
  3. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. doi
  4. (2003). Children are cursed: An Assymetric bias in mental-state attributions. doi
  5. (1987). Children's conceptions of relations between messages, meanings and reality. doi
  6. (2001). Children's difficulties with partial representations in ambiguous messages and referentially opaque contexts. doi
  7. (1983). Children's understanding of the relation between expressions (what was said) and intentions (what was meant). doi
  8. (1988). Children’s knowledge about representations of intended meaning. In
  9. (1998). Children’s mental representation of referential relations. doi
  10. (2005). Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Paper under submission. doi
  11. (2002). Competing claims about competing knowledge claims.
  12. (1988). Conceptual perspective taking: Children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see. doi
  13. (1970). Confidence in the prediction and postdiction of an uncertain outcome. doi
  14. (1987). Development of relational reasoning and avoidance of premature closure. doi
  15. (2005). Do young children have implicit understanding of ambiguity? Manuscript under submission.
  16. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. doi
  17. (1988). Early developments in logical reasoning: Considering alternative possibilities. doi
  18. (1994). Early understanding of referential intent and attentional focus: Evidence from language and emotion.
  19. (1982). Effect of increasing the salience of message ambiguities on kindergarteners' evaluations of communicative success and message adequacy. doi
  20. (2001). Epistemic and physical
  21. (2000). Interpersonal understanding fuels knowledge acquisition. doi
  22. (1996). Knowing about guessing and guessing about knowing: Preschoolers' understanding of indeterminacy. doi
  23. (1982). Knowing when you don't know enough: children's judgements about ambiguous information, doi
  24. (2002). Known, unknown and unknowable uncertainties.
  25. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. doi
  26. (1983). Logical Reasoning. doi
  27. (1996). On the Distinction Between False Belief Understanding and Subscribing to as Interpretive Theory of the Mind. doi
  28. (2003). Overcoming the positive capture strategy in young children: Learning about indeterminacy. doi
  29. (1981). Performative bias in children’s interpretation of ambiguous referential communications. doi
  30. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. doi
  31. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. doi
  32. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. doi
  33. (1981). The development of informative messages in referential communication: Knowing when versus knowing how. In W.P.Dickson, (Ed) Children’s oral communication skills.
  34. (1980). The development of modal reasoning: Genesis of necessity and possibility notions.
  35. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. doi
  36. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition and reasoning: A lifespan perspective. In
  37. (1981). Training referential communication skills. In W.P.Dickson, (Ed) Children’s oral communication skills. doi
  38. (2001). Two-year-old children’s sensitivity to the referential inefficiency of their own pointing gestures. doi
  39. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. doi
  40. (1996). Young children's ability to detect ambiguity in descriptions of location. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.