Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Unit versus ad valorem taxes : the private ownership of monopoly in general equilibrium

By Sushama Murty and Charles Blackorby

Abstract

In an earlier paper [Blackorby and Murty; 2007] we showed that if a monopoly sector is imbedded in a general equilibrium framework and profits are taxed at one hundred percent, then unit (specific) taxation and ad valorem taxation are welfare-wise equivalent. In this paper, we consider private ownership of the monopoly sector. Given technical difficulties in making a direct general equilibrium comparison of unit and ad valorem taxation, we\ud adopt a technique due to Guesnerie [1980] and Quinzii [1992] in a somewhat different context of increasing returns and non-convex economies to show that neither ad valorem taxation nor unit taxation Pareto dominates the other; although, generally, the two are not welfare-wise equivalent

Topics: HB
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:58

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1988). Generalized Concavity, doi
  2. (1979). Expenditure Functions, Local Duality, doi
  3. (2007). Unit versus Ad Valorem Taxes: Monopoly in General Equilibrium”, doi
  4. (1960). Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, Frank Cass and Co.,
  5. (1992). The Comparision between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation Under Imperfect doi
  6. (1978). Taxing Price Makers” doi
  7. (2007). 35Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes: Private Ownership and GE.Monopoly. doi
  8. (1995). A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Taxation, doi
  9. The Balance between Specific and doi
  10. (2004). Competition in Unit vs. doi
  11. (1931). Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint, doi
  12. (1992). Increasing Returns and Efficiency,
  13. (1994). A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments” doi
  14. (1953). Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes doi
  15. Taxation in the Monopoly Case” in Readings in the Economics of Taxation edited

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.