Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease : a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany

By Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Markus Bönte, Johannes Siegrist, Lisa Marceau, Carol Link, Sara Arber, Ann Adams and John McKinlay


Background\ud The way patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are treated is partly determined by non-medical factors. There is a solid body of evidence that patient and physician characteristics influence doctors' management decisions. Relatively little is known about the role of structural issues in the decision making process. This study focuses on the question whether doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are influenced by the health care system in which they take place. This non-medical determinant of medical decision-making was investigated in an international research project in the US, the UK and Germany.\ud \ud Methods\ud Videotaped patients within an experimental study design were used. Experienced actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patients of different sex, age and social status. The videotapes were shown to 384 randomly selected primary care physicians in the three countries under study. The sample was stratified on gender and duration of professional experience. Physicians were asked how they would diagnose and manage the patient after watching the video vignette using a questionnaire with standardised and open-ended questions.\ud \ud Results\ud Results show only small differences in decision making between British and American physicians in essential aspects of care. About 90% of the UK and US doctors identified CHD as one of the possible diagnoses. Further similarities were found in test ordering and lifestyle advice. Some differences between the US and UK were found in the certainty of the diagnoses, prescribed medications and referral behaviour. There are numerous significant differences between Germany and the other two countries. German physicians would ask fewer questions, they would order fewer tests, prescribe fewer medications and give less lifestyle advice.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Although all physicians in the three countries under study were presented exactly the same patient, some disparities in the diagnostic and patient management decisions were evident. Since other possible influences on doctors treatment decisions are controlled within the experimental design, characteristics of the health care system seem to be a crucial factor within the decision making process.\ud \u

Topics: RC
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). Cardiac chest pain: does body language help the diagnosis? Br Med J doi
  2. (2004). Cleary PD: Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs. Medicare managed care. JAMA doi
  3. (2003). Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. Health Aff doi
  4. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA doi
  5. (1957). Cox CM: Experimental designs doi
  6. (2004). E: Confronting competing demands to improve quality: a fivecountry hospital survey. Health Aff doi
  7. (2005). GP reimbursement and visiting behaviour in Ireland. Health Econ doi
  8. (2008). JB: Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently? Womens Health Issues doi
  9. (2006). Lutfey K: How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experiment. Health Serv Res doi
  10. (1997). Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: an experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey sampling. Health Serv Res
  11. (2006). Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: a video-simulation experiment. Soc Sci Med doi
  12. (2006). Peacock SJ: Supplier-induced demand: reconsidering the theories and new Australian evidence. Appl Health Econ Health Policy doi
  13. (1997). physician and presentational influences on clinical decision making for breast cancer: results from a factorial experiment. J Eval Clin Pract doi
  14. (2004). Primary care and health system performance: adults' experiences in five countries. Health Aff doi
  15. (2003). Russel VL: Comparison of treatment and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction in doi
  16. (1990). Statistical methods, experimental design and scientific inference doi
  17. (1974). Supplier-induced demand: some empirical evidence and implications.
  18. (2006). The impact of health plan delivery system organization on clinical quality and patient satisfaction. Health Serv Res doi
  19. (2002). The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: Results of an experiment. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.