Location of Repository

Money and mental wellbeing : a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins

By Jonathan Gardner and Andrew J. Oswald

Abstract

One of the famous questions in social science is whether money makes people happy. We offer new evidence by using longitudinal data on a random sample of Britons who receive medium-sized lottery wins of between £1000 and £120,000 (that is, up to approximately US$ 200,000). When compared to two control groups – one with no wins and the other with small wins – these individuals go on eventually to exhibit significantly better psychological health. Two years after a lottery win, the average measured improvement in mental wellbeing is 1.4 GHQ points.\ud \u

Topics: HN
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:320

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1996). (Eds.) Hedonic psychology: Scientific approaches to enjoyment, suffering, and wellbeing. Russell Sage Foundation: doi
  2. (2005). A model of affective adaptation. University of Virginia: working paper;
  3. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. doi
  4. (2001). Adapting to heart conditions: A test of the hedonic treadmill. doi
  5. (1999). Are wages habit-forming? Evidence from micro data. doi
  6. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. doi
  7. (1995). Can money buy happiness? Science doi
  8. (2000). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Not for long, but here to stay. doi
  9. (2005). Disability and sunshine: Can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation? doi
  10. (2006). Do divorcing couples become happier by breaking up? doi
  11. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David PA, Reder MW (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz. doi
  12. (2005). Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges, University of Warwick: working paper; doi
  13. (2001). Does money buy happiness? A longitudinal study using data on windfalls. University of Warwick: working paper;
  14. (2001). Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor earnings, savings, and consumption: Evidence from a survey of lottery players. American Economic Review doi
  15. (2004). Evolutionary efficiency and happiness. University of Chicago: working paper;
  16. (2005). Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics doi
  17. (2003). Explaining happiness. doi
  18. (2005). Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological wellbeing and perceived social support in England. doi
  19. (2003). Exploring the health-wealth nexus. doi
  20. (2005). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel, working paper, doi
  21. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. doi
  22. (2002). Happiness and economics. doi
  23. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. doi
  24. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Allen Lane: London; Lindahl M. Estimating the effect of income on health and mortality using lottery prizes as an exogenous source of variation in income.
  25. (2005). Happiness: The science behind your smile. doi
  26. (2004). How is mortality affected by money, marriage and stress? doi
  27. (2005). Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemodialysis: A study using ecological momentary assessment. doi
  28. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. doi
  29. (2005). Insights on development from the economics of happiness. World Bank Research Observer doi
  30. (2004). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. DELTA Paris: working paper; doi
  31. (2005). Local neighbourhood and mental health: Evidence from the UK. Social Science and Medicine doi
  32. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims – is happiness relative? doi
  33. (2003). Mental health in Northern Ireland: Have the Troubles made it worse? doi
  34. (2000). Mental health, social functioning, and attitudes of Kosovar Albanians following the war in Kosovo. doi
  35. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review doi
  36. (2005). On the common claim that happiness equations demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of income. IZA Discussion paper 1781, and University of Warwick working paper;
  37. (2001). Partnership dissolution in the UK - the role of economic circumstances. doi
  38. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. doi
  39. (2003). Review of Economics and Statistics doi
  40. Social gradients in subjective wellbeing: Is it money or person control that matters?
  41. (2004). Status syndrome. London: Bloomsbury; doi
  42. (2000). Stress and psychiatric disorder in healthcare professionals and hospital staff. Lancet doi
  43. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. doi
  44. (1993). The Carnegie conjecture: Some empirical evidence. doi
  45. (2005). The causal effect of income on health: Evidence from German reunification. doi
  46. (1997). The lottery winner survey, crime and social interactions, and why is there more crime in cities? Harvard University: PhD thesis;
  47. (2001). The psychology of happiness. doi
  48. (1992). The pursuit of happiness.
  49. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. doi
  50. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. doi
  51. (2005). wealth and happiness. Psychological Science doi
  52. (1996). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Economica doi
  53. (2002). Will money increase subjective wellbeing? Social Indicators Research doi
  54. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.