Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Similarity and attraction effects in episodic memory judgments \ud \ud

By Elizabeth A. Maylor and Matthew A. J. Roberts

Abstract

In the decision-making literature, it is known that preferences between two options can be influenced in different ways by the introduction of a third option. We investigated whether such influences could be demonstrated when making decisions about qualitative aspects of episodic memories. In a baseline condition, participants were asked which of two dissimilar events they remembered more vividly: (A) a well-known Olympic victory, or (B) the death of a well-known public figure. In two further conditions, a third event was added: (C) an Olympic victory similar and competitive to A, or (D) an Olympic victory similar but inferior to A. With the addition of C, participants were less likely to choose A than B (similarity effect), whereas with the addition of D, they were more likely to choose A than B (attraction effect), suggesting that effects known in decision-making can be generalised to relative judgments about episodic memories.\ud \u

Topics: BF
Publisher: Elsevier BV
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:376

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories. doi
  2. (1970). A two-process memory-strength theory for judgment of recency. doi
  3. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. doi
  4. (1987). Changes in consumer choice: Further investigation of similarity and attraction effects. doi
  5. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. doi
  6. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. doi
  7. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. doi
  8. (2000). Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
  9. (2000). Explaining context effects on choice using a model of comparative judgment. doi
  10. (1977). Flashbulb memories. doi
  11. (1959). Individual choice behaviour: A theoretical analysis.
  12. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. doi
  13. (2005). Memory strength and recency judgments. doi
  14. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. doi
  15. (1981). Reality monitoring. doi
  16. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: doi
  17. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. doi
  18. (1996). The Hon Lord doi
  19. (1959). The measurement of values. doi
  20. (1988). Time present and time past. In doi
  21. (2001). Wisdom and aging: Irrational preferences in college students but not older adults. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.