Location of Repository

Psychophysics and the judgment of price: judging complex objects on a non-physical dimension elicits sequential effects like those in perceptual tasks

By William J. Matthews and Neil Stewart

Abstract

When participants in psychophysical experiments are asked to estimate or identify stimuli which differ on a single\ud physical dimension, their judgments are influenced by the local experimental context — the item presented and judgment\ud made on the previous trial. It has been suggested that similar sequential effects occur in more naturalistic, real-world judgments. In three experiments we asked participants to judge the prices of a sequence of items. In Experiment 1, judgments were biased towards the previous response (assimilation) but away from the true value of the previous item (contrast), a pattern which matches that found in psychophysical research. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we manipulated the provision of feedback and the expertise of the participants, and found that feedback reduced the effect of the previous judgment and shifted the effect of the previous item’s true price from contrast to assimilation. Finally, in all three experiments we found that judgments were biased towards the centre of the range, a phenomenon known as the “regression effect” in psychophysics. These results suggest that the most recently-presented item is a point of reference for the current judgment. The findings inform our understanding of the judgment process, constrain the explanations for\ud local context effects put forward by psychophysicists, and carry practical importance for real-world situations in which contextual bias may degrade the accuracy of judgments

Topics: HB, BF
Publisher: Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:608

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). A decision-bysampling account of decision under risk. doi
  2. (1983). A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. doi
  3. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. doi
  4. (2007). A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error.
  5. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. doi
  6. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. doi
  7. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  8. (2008). An integrated model of choices and responses times in absolute identification. doi
  9. (1996). Applied linear regression models (3rd Ed.). London : doi
  10. (1960). Binaural summation of loudness. doi
  11. (1965). Category judgment : A range frequency model. doi
  12. (2007). Context effects in games: Local versus global sequential effects on choice in the prisoner’s dilemma game.
  13. (1998). Effects of stimulus information and number of stimuli on sequential dependencies in absolute identification. doi
  14. (2001). Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. doi
  15. (2004). Human Judgment: The eye of the beholder.
  16. (1999). Hypothesisconsistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm : A selective accessibility model. doi
  17. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling. doi
  18. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. doi
  19. (1962). Loudness, reciprocality, and partition scales. doi
  20. (2007). Memory for moving and static images. doi
  21. (1990). Mixed-methods mixed-modality psychophysical scaling. doi
  22. (1985). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Inter- and intramodality sequential dependencies as a function of lag. doi
  23. (1982). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties. doi
  24. (2008). Modeling sequential context effects in judgment analysis: A time series approach.
  25. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. doi
  26. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. doi
  27. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. doi
  28. Remembranceofsoundspast: Memory and psychophysical scaling.
  29. (1995). Screening cervical smears. doi
  30. (1970). Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. doi
  31. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  32. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. doi
  33. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. doi
  34. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks.
  35. (1979). Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and crossmodality matching. doi
  36. Subliminalanchoring : Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
  37. (2006). The anchoring-andadjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insuffi-cient. doi
  38. (1909). The inaccuracy of movement.
  39. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minustwo: somelimitsonourcapacityforinformation processing.
  40. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgment. doi
  41. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. doi
  42. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.