Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Implementing a 48 h EWTD-compliant rota for junior doctors in the UK does not compromise patients’ safety : assessor-blind pilot comparison

By Francesco Cappuccio, A. Bakewell, Frances M. Taggart, G. Ward, Chen Ji, J.P. Sullivan, M. Edmunds, R. Pounder, C. P. Landrigan, S. W. Lockley and Ed Peile


Background: There are currently no field data about the effect of implementing European Working Time Directive (EWTD)-compliant rotas in a medical setting. Surveys of doctors’ subjective opinions on shift work have not provided reliable objective data with which to evaluate its efficacy. \ud \ud Aim: We therefore studied the effects on patient's safety and doctors’ work-sleep patterns of implementing an EWTD-compliant 48 h work week in a single-blind intervention study carried out over a 12-week period at the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust. We hypothesized that medical error rates would be reduced following the new rota. \ud \ud Methods: Nineteen junior doctors, nine studied while working an intervention schedule of <48 h per week and 10 studied while working traditional weeks of <56 h scheduled hours in medical wards. Work hours and sleep duration were recorded daily. Rate of medical errors (per 1000 patient-days), identified using an established active surveillance methodology, were compared for the Intervention and Traditional wards. Two senior physicians blinded to rota independently rated all suspected errors. \ud \ud Results: Average scheduled work hours were significantly lower on the intervention schedule [43.2 (SD 7.7) (range 26.0–60.0) vs. 52.4 (11.2) (30.0–77.0) h/week; P < 0.001], and there was a non-significant trend for increased total sleep time per day [7.26 (0.36) vs. 6.75 (0.40) h; P = 0.095]. During a total of 4782 patient-days involving 481 admissions, 32.7% fewer total medical errors occurred during the intervention than during the traditional rota (27.6 vs. 41.0 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.006), including 82.6% fewer intercepted potential adverse events (1.2 vs. 6.9 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.002) and 31.4% fewer non-intercepted potential adverse events (16.6 vs. 24.2 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.067). Doctors reported worse educational opportunities on the intervention rota. \ud \ud Conclusions: Whilst concerns remain regarding reduced educational opportunities, our study supports the hypothesis that a 48 h work week coupled with targeted efforts to improve sleep hygiene improves patient safety. \ud \ud \ud \u

Topics: R1
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. doi
  2. (2008). Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common Programme Requirements for Residents Duty Hours.
  3. (2007). Acute sleep deprivation and circadian misalignment associated with transition onto the first night of work impairs visual selective attention. PLoS One doi
  4. (2001). Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. Br Med J doi
  5. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. doi
  6. (2004). Can training and service survive the European Working Time Directive?. Med Educ doi
  7. (2003). Case record review of adverse events: a new approach. Qual Saf Health Care doi
  8. (2008). Changes in working patterns hit emergency general surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl doi
  9. (2004). Defining and classifying medical error: lessons from patient safety reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care doi
  10. (1994). Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med doi
  11. (2008). Economic Research Unit. BMA survey of junior doctors’ views on working hours and the European Working Time Directive.
  12. (2004). Effect of reducing intern’s work 280 F.P. Cappuccio et al.hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. doi
  13. (2004). Effect of reducing interns’ weekly work hours on sleep and attentional failures. doi
  14. (2006). European junior doctors who work at night. Eurohealth
  15. (2004). Evidence-based policy making. Br Med J doi
  16. (2006). Extended work duration and the risk of selfreported percutaneous injuries in interns. JAMA doi
  17. (2005). Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns. doi
  18. (2000). Human error: models and management. doi
  19. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events. IHI Innovation Series White Paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
  20. (2006). Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. Plos Med doi
  21. (2007). Implications of shift work for junior doctors. doi
  22. (1995). Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA doi
  23. (2005). Junior doctors’ shifts and sleep deprivation. Br Med J doi
  24. (2008). Junior doctors’ working hours: can 56 go into 48? Clin Med doi
  25. (2006). Medication errors related to computer order entry in children. Pediatrics doi
  26. (2007). Mental health of applicants seems to be deteriorating. Br Med J doi
  27. (2005). Neurobehavioral performance of residents after heavy night call vs after alcohol ingestion. JAMA doi
  28. (2008). Not just about working hours. doi
  29. (2006). Pounder R on behalf of the Multidisciplinary Working Group of the Royal College of Physicians. Designing Safer Rotas for Junior Doctors in the 48-Hour Week, Royal College of Physicians,
  30. (2008). Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. Br Med J doi
  31. (1982). Rotating shift work schedules that disrupt sleep are improved by applying circadian principles. Science doi
  32. (2008). Safety and the flying doctor. doi
  33. (2003). Shift work, safety and productivity. Occup Med doi
  34. (2005). Shift work: safety, sleepiness and sleep. Industrial Health doi
  35. (2005). Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. doi
  36. Social Policy – Council Directive 93/1 04/EC – Concepts of working time and rest period – On-call service provided by doctors in hospitals
  37. (1999). Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. Science
  38. (2004). The Canadian Adverse Event Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospitals patients in Canada. CMAJ
  39. (2003). The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep
  40. (2008). The effect of the EWTD on surgical SpRs: a regional survey. Ann R Coll SurgEngl doi
  41. (2003). Trainees’ attitudes to shift work depend on grade and specialty. Br Med J doi
  42. (1998). Using a computerized sign-out program to improve continuity of inpatient care and prevent adverse events.
  43. (2006). When policy meets physiology. The challenge of reducing resident work hours. Clin Orthop Relat Res doi
  44. (2006). Who’s for five nine-hour shifts a week? Clin Med doi
  45. (2007). Work patterns and fatigue-related risk among junior doctors. Occup Environ Med doi
  46. (2006). Working the night shift: preparation, survival and recovery – a guide for junior doctors. Clin Med doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.