Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Is democratisation bad for global warming?

By Peter J. Burnell

Abstract

Summary: even if democracy and all good things go together the same may not be as true of democratisation. Given the growing number of countries that have attempted democratisation, with varying success, and as the challenge of addressing the causes of climate change becomes increasingly more urgent, it is worth knowing if democratisation makes that challenge more difficult. Similarly it is worth knowing if the political conditions for an effective response to climate instability and its economic and social consequences must impact on the outlook for democratisation. Although contrary to what was once believed, developing countries may not have the dilemma of having to choose between developing the economy and building democracy, the further addition of a requirement to significantly reduce carbon emissions might be just too demanding. The paper offers a framework of analysis as a preliminary to more detailed empirical investigation. It concludes with policy implications for international actors committed to promoting democracy, considering that in developing countries stable authoritarian rule might be better placed than regimes in political transition to mitigate climate change as well as adapt to its effects

Topics: JC
Publisher: University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:898

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). And yet they persist: explaining survival and transition in neopatrimonial regimes’, doi
  2. (2008). Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?’, doi
  3. (2009). Authoritarian Backlash (Farnham:
  4. (2007). Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (Cambridge: doi
  5. (2006). Autocratic opening to legitimacy: why legitimacy matters?’, doi
  6. (2008). Bertelsmann Transformation Index 2008, online at http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de Bhagwati, doi
  7. (2008). Bringing the in-between back in: foreign policy in global environmental politics’, doi
  8. (2008). China’s Policies and Actions Addressing Climate Change (White Paper), available at http://www.china.org.cn/government/news/2008-10/29/content_16681689.htm
  9. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change’, doi
  10. (2004). Defusing the bombshell? Agenda 21 and economic development in China’, doi
  11. (2002). Democracy and development: cruel dilemma or symbiotic relationship’, doi
  12. (2006). Democracy and environmental degradation’, doi
  13. (2002). Democracy and Global Warming (London and doi
  14. (1996). Democracy and the Environment doi
  15. (1998). Democracy and the environment: an empirical assessment’, doi
  16. (2002). Democracy and the environment’, in doi
  17. (1998). Democratizing for peace’,
  18. (2001). Democratizing with ethnic divisions: a source of conflict?’, doi
  19. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis’, doi
  20. (2005). Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War doi
  21. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies’, doi
  22. (1995). Freedom and the environment’, doi
  23. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict doi
  24. (2008). Liberal democracy and sustainability’, doi
  25. (2007). Linkage and leverage: how do international factors change domestic balances of power?’,
  26. (1985). On the political consequences of scarcity and economic decline’, doi
  27. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism’, doi
  28. (2009). Politics and growth’, doi
  29. (2008). Setting the negotiating table: the race to replace Kyoto by 2012’,
  30. (1999). The German Marshall Fund of the United States (various years), Transatlantic Trends, online http://www.transatlantictrends.org
  31. (2008). The Return of History and the End of Dreams doi
  32. (2008). through war?’, doi
  33. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change and civil war, 1816-1992’,
  34. (2000). War and peace in space and time: the role of democratization’, doi
  35. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years?’, doi
  36. (2008). World Development Report 2008, available online at http://worldbank.org

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.