Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The determination of directors' remuneration in selected FTSE 350 companies

By Ruth Bender

Abstract

This thesis has adopted a qualitative approach to research into executive remuneration, to look inside the 'black box' of process. Executives, nonexecutives and others involved in the remuneration-setting process were interviewed in order to establish how executive remuneration is determined. In all, 40 interviews were conducted, covering 12 FTSE 350 companies plus other stakeholder bodies.\ud The interviews yielded rich data illuminating the processes followed by the companies, and highlighting their similarities and differences. These data were considered in the light of existing economic, social-psychological and organisational theory approaches,n one of which proved sufficient, either alone or in combination, to explain what was happening.\ud Companies determine the level of their executive pay based on their interpretation of 'the market', but the research shows that such a market is a construct that does not exist independently. They determine the structure of their executive pay based mainly on structures successfully adopted by other companies, and those considered acceptable to the investing institutions and regulators. Institutional theory explanations and the need for legitimacy are clearly seen in the data.\ud A further finding of the research was that all of the companies had made changes to their remuneration schemes, some major. The various reasons for these changes included changes (actual or desired) to the corporate environment, changes to key personnel, and, notably, the need to increase pay packages that were 'below-market'. Incentive schemes that did not pay out were also changed.\ud Finally, as regards process, it was clear that each of the case companies followed 'good governance' practices. It was also clear that each did this in a different way. For some, the process was managed by the non-executives; in others the executives had a leading role. The relationships between the protagonists had an important impact on the resultant governance processes

Topics: HD
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1206

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). term Incentive Plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, doi
  2. (1987). The Fly on the Wall of the Inner Sanctum: Observing Company Directors at Work. In: Research Methods for Elite Studies, edited by
  3. (2002). The Rise of Consultancy and the Prospect for Regions. In: Critical Consulting: New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, edited by
  4. (1997). Good Timing: doi
  5. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2 nd edition,
  6. (2000). Boards of Directors and the Adoption of a CEO Performance Evaluation Process: Agency and Institutional Theory Perspectives. doi
  7. (2003). executive officer CFO Chief financial officer Combined Code (on Corporate A regulatory code annexed to the Listing Governance) ("The Code") Rules for listed companies. A new Code was issued in
  8. (2002). Directors' Remuneration Report A Statutory Instrument requiring listed Regulations
  9. (2003). Higgs report Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.