Location of Repository

Was Germany ever united? Evidence from intra- and international trade 1885–1933

By Nikolaus Wolf

Abstract

When did Germany become economically integrated? Within the framework of a gravity model, based on a new data set of about 40,000 observations on trade flows within and across the borders of Germany over the period 1885 – 1933, I explore the geography of trade costs across Central Europe. There are three key results. First, the German Empire before 1914 was a poorly integrated economy, both relative to integration across the borders of the German state and in absolute terms. Second, this internal fragmentation resulted from cultural heterogeneity, from administrative borders within Germany, and from geographical barriers that divided Germany along natural trade routes into eastern and western parts. Third, internal integration improved, while external integration worsened after World War I and again with the Great Depression, in part because of border changes along the lines of ethno-linguistic heterogeneity. By the end of the Weimar Republic in 1933, Germany was reasonably well integrated

Topics: HC, DD
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1345

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). A Spatial Theory of Trade”, doi
  2. (1928). Binnenschifffahrt und Eisenbahn. Werden, Gestalt und Problem ihres verhältnisses im Deutschen Reich,
  3. (1989). Commerce and coalitions: How trade affects domestic political Alignments, doi
  4. (1993). Contract Enforceability and Economic Institution in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders Coalition”, doi
  5. (1973). Das Deutsche Kaiserreich 1871-1918, doi
  6. (1965). Der Primat der Innenpolitik. Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Preussisch-Deutschen Sozialgeschichte (collection of works by Kehr edited by Hans-Ulrich Wehler), doi
  7. (1993). Deutsche Geschichte 1866-1918. Zweiter Band. Machtstaat vor der Demokratie,
  8. (1966). Die deutsche Rechtseinheit im 19. Jahrhundert als rechtspolitisches Problem, Bonn: Verlag Ludwig Roehrscheid, doi
  9. Economic Geography and International Inequality”, doi
  10. (2005). Economic integration across borders: the Polish interwar economy 1921-1937”, doi
  11. (2002). edited by Toni Pierenkemper, doi
  12. (2002). Ethnic Chinese Networks in International Trade’, doi
  13. (1941). Exchange Control in Central Europe, Cambridge: doi
  14. (2005). From political Fragmentation towards a customs union: Border effects of the German Zollverein, 1815-1855“, doi
  15. (2006). Globalization and the Gains from Variety," doi
  16. (2007). Good Bye Lenin (or not?) doi
  17. (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A solution to the Border Puzzle”, doi
  18. (1961). Griff nach der Weltmacht. Die Kriegszielpolitik des kaiserlichen Deutschlands 1914/1918, doi
  19. (1996). How Wide is the Border?”, doi
  20. (2003). Intranational Home Bias: Some Explanations", doi
  21. (1954). Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations, doi
  22. (2004). Local Comparative Advantage: Trade Costs and the Pattern of Trade”, doi
  23. (2008). Marc Melitz and Yona Rubinstein. “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes” forthcoming in doi
  24. (2008). Max-Stephan Schulze and Nikolaus Wolf “Endogenous Borders? Exploring a natural experiment on border effects”, CEPR Discussion Paper 6909,
  25. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns”, doi
  26. (1986). On the extent of the market: wholesale gasoline in the Northeastern United States”, doi
  27. (2007). On the Origins of Border Effects: Evidence from he Habsburg Customs Unions”,
  28. (2007). Openness and Growth: The Long Shadow of the Berlin Wall”, doi
  29. (1993). Otmar von. Das Alte Reich. doi
  30. (2005). Path Dependent Border Effects: the Case of Poland’s reunification (1918-1939)”, doi
  31. (2006). Planning Ahead and Falling Behind. The East German Economy doi
  32. (1993). Regionale Entwicklungsdisparitäten im deutschen Industrialisierungsprozess 1849-1939,
  33. (2007). Ruggedness: The blessing of bad geography in Africa”, doi
  34. (1938). Tariff Levels and the Economic Unity of Europe. London: Allen and Unwin, doi
  35. (2008). Tariffs, Trains, and Trade: The Role of Institutions versus Technology in the Expansion of Markets”, doi
  36. (2008). Tear down this Wall: On the Persistence of Borders in Trade”, doi
  37. (2005). The ‘Death of Distance’. What does it mean for economic development?”,
  38. (2008). The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification”, forthcoming in American Economic Review, doi
  39. (1995). The economic performance of inland navigation in Germany, 1835-1935: A reassessment”.
  40. (2003). The Economic Significance of National Border Effects," doi
  41. (1989). The monetary unification process in 19th-century Germany: relevance and lessons for Europe today" In A European Central Bank? Perspectives on monetary unification after ten years EMS, edited by M. de Cecco and A. Giovannini Cambridge: doi
  42. (2008). The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on doi
  43. (1945). The Regions of Germany, doi
  44. (1998). The Rhetoric of Economics,
  45. (2005). The Trade-creating Effects of Business and Social Networks: Evidence from France”, doi
  46. (2001). Towards a Geography of Trade Costs”, doi
  47. (2001). Volker.“It's Not Right, But It's Okay: On the Measurement of Intra-
  48. (1965). Zweiter Band. Erste Hälfte. Die Entwicklung des Verkehrssystems,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.