Location of Repository

Issues on the choice of exchange rate regimes and currency boards – an analytical survey

By Ashwin Moheeput


Currency boards have often been at the heart of monetary reforms proposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) : they have been instrumental either as a short term crisis management strategy that successfully restores financial order for many countries seeking stabilization in the aftermath of prolonged economic crisis or as a way of importing monetary credibility as part of a medium / long term strategy for conducting monetary policy. As backbone of a credible exchange-rate based stabilisation programme, they have also been the linchpin of several heterodox or orthodox programmes aimed at mitigating hyperinflation. This paper attempts to synthetize our thinking about currency boards by reviewing their strengths and weaknesses and endeavours to seek real world examples to rationalise their applicability as opposed to alternative exchange rate regimes. Architects of international financial stability at the IMF or at central banks often ponder about the prerequisites for such programme to work well. These are also reviewed using appropriate economic theory where necessary. Finally, this paper sheds light on the best exchange rate regime that may be adopted in the intermediate term by those countries wishing to adopt a currency board, not as a quick fix solution to end an economic chaos but rather, as integral part of a long term monetary strategy

Topics: HG
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1361

Suggested articles



  1. (2004). A single Currency for Africa”, Finance and Development,
  2. (1998). Are Currency Boards a Cure for all Monetary Problems”, Finance and Development,
  3. (2000). Currency Boards in Developing Countries: A Handbook”, Institute for Contemporary Studies. Available online at: http://users.erols.com/kurrency/icegrev.htm
  4. (1998). Currency Boards: The Ultimate Fix?" IMF Working Paper 98/8 (Washington: International Monetary Fund) doi
  5. (2007). Exchange Rate Arrangements in Emerging Markets: An Institutional Mechanism Design Approach”, mimeo
  6. (2000). Exchange Rate Policy for Developing Countries”, American Economic Review, doi
  7. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar view correct ?”, Finance and Development, doi
  8. (1997). Making a Currency Board Operational,"
  9. (2004). Shogo Ishii and Cem Karacedg
  10. (1981). Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic ”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review,
  11. The case against Currency Boards: debunking 10 myths about the benefits of Currency Boards”, Nouriel Roubini website doi
  12. (1995). The Mirage of Fixed Exchange Rate Regime”, doi
  13. (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal”, doi
  14. (1964). Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems”, doi
  15. (2001). Transition Countries’ choice of exchange rate regime in the run-up to EMU membership”, Finance and Development, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.