Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The properties of some goodness-of-fit tests

By Gianna Boero, Jeremy Smith and Kenneth Frank Wallis


The properties of Pearson’s goodness-of-fit test, as used in density forecast evaluation, income distribution analysis and elsewhere, are analysed. The components-of-chi-squared or “Pearson analog” tests of Anderson (1994) are shown to be less generally applicable than was originally claimed. For the case of equiprobable classes, where the general components tests remain valid, a Monte Carlo study shows that tests directed towards skewness and kurtosis may have low power, due to differences between the class boundaries and the intersection points of the distributions being compared. The power of individual component tests can be increased by the use of nonequiprobable classes

Topics: QA
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1979). A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. doi
  2. (2000). An evaluation of tests of distributional forecasts. doi
  3. (1992). An exact Cholesky decomposition and the generalized inverse of the variance-covariance matrix of the multinomial distribution, with applications. doi
  4. (1999). Asymmetric density forecasts of inflation and the Bank of England’s fan chart. doi
  5. (1981). Efficient tests for normality, homoskedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals”, doi
  6. (1999). Evaluating density forecasts of inflation: the Survey of Professional Forecasters. doi
  7. (1998). Matrix Algebra and its Applications to Statistics and Econometrics. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. doi
  8. (1996). Nonparametric tests of stochastic dominance in income distributions. doi
  9. (1994). Simple tests of distributional form. doi
  10. (2002). The performance of non-linear exchange rate models: a forecasting comparison. doi
  11. (2001). The power and size of nonparametric tests for common distributional characteristics. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.