Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Contested accountability: civil society and the international fair trade association

By Heidi Ullrich


This working paper examines the impact that engagement (or non-engagement) by civil society groups has had on enhancing the accountability of the International Fair Trade Association (IFAT) within the Fair Trade Movement. IFAT, the only global Fair Trade association that develops and regulates voluntary standards and certification mechanisms for organizations of Southern Fair Trade producers and Northern Fair Trade sellers, has the potential to play a unique global governance role within the Fair Trade Movement. Despite other global governance regulatory bodies increasingly contesting IFAT’s accountability, IFAT has taken concrete steps to address gaps in its accountability. After describing the challenges IFAT is facing as a private global governance institution, the paper identifies the key components of accountability in IFAT through outlining its governance and operational structure, including its monitoring system. It then explores the extent of civil society engagement with IFAT within the context of the Fair Trade Movement. The paper then outlines and evaluates IFAT’s ‘New Strategic Plan’, an initiative of its members that was adopted in 2007. The paper concludes with an assessment of the extent to which engagement by civil society groups have helped or hindered the accountability of IFAT and offers recommendations for strengthening its relations with civil society in order to close the current accountability gap in its global governance role

Topics: HF, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. Aart
  2. (2007). Assesses Whether to Undertake Standardization on Fair Trade.” INNI Online Update. Issue #14.
  3. (2007). Available at:
  4. (2007). Comparison between the Current IFAT Position, the Agenda for Change and the New Strategic Plan.”
  5. (2005). Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. doi
  6. (2007). Fairtrade FAQs. Available at:
  7. (2005). Fifty Years of Fair Trade: A Brief History of the Fair Trade Movement.” Prepared for IFAT. Available at:
  8. (2007). Forging Global Accountabilities: Participation, Pluralism and Public Ethics. doi
  9. (2006). FTO’s in Europe- Building a Common Future. Report from the
  10. (2007). India on the Move: Scanning the Social Actors. Available at: (Accessed.
  11. (2007). Monitoring: Building Trust in Fair Trade”. Available at:
  12. (1996). NGOs and Fairtrade, the Perspectives of Some Fairtrade Organisations. Trieste, Italy: La Città Invisibile.
  13. Report and Recommendations on the Standardization of Fair Trade. Prepared by Fatma Bensalem of AFNOR with the participation of Sadie Homer of Consumers International and Dana Kissinger-Matray of ISO/COPOLCO.
  14. (2007). Risks lie ahead following stronger trade in 2006, WTO reports”.
  15. (2007). The Ten Standards of Fair Trade. As approved at the Quito, Ecuador AGM. Available at:
  16. (2006). Towards a Polanyian Perspective on Fair Trade: Marketbased Relationships and the doi
  17. Trade Advocacy Office (2005). Fair Trade in Europe 2005: Facts and Figures on Fair Trade in 25 European Countries. Survey prepared by Jean-Marie Krier.
  18. Trade Advocacy Office (2007a). “An ISO Norm on Fair Trade?”
  19. Trade Advocacy Office (2007b). “Fair Trade Standards and their Verification in Brief”.
  20. (2007). Trade Justice and Individual Consumption Choices: Adam Smith’s Spectator Theory and the Moral Constitution of the Fair Trade Consumer.” doi
  21. (2007). Trade Original doi
  22. (2007). Tradecraft
  23. What is Fair Trade? Available at:
  24. (2007). Where did it all begin? Available at: it=1&limitstart=1.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.