Contested accountability: civil society and the international fair trade association

Abstract

This working paper examines the impact that engagement (or non-engagement) by civil society groups has had on enhancing the accountability of the International Fair Trade Association (IFAT) within the Fair Trade Movement. IFAT, the only global Fair Trade association that develops and regulates voluntary standards and certification mechanisms for organizations of Southern Fair Trade producers and Northern Fair Trade sellers, has the potential to play a unique global governance role within the Fair Trade Movement. Despite other global governance regulatory bodies increasingly contesting IFAT’s accountability, IFAT has taken concrete steps to address gaps in its accountability. After describing the challenges IFAT is facing as a private global governance institution, the paper identifies the key components of accountability in IFAT through outlining its governance and operational structure, including its monitoring system. It then explores the extent of civil society engagement with IFAT within the context of the Fair Trade Movement. The paper then outlines and evaluates IFAT’s ‘New Strategic Plan’, an initiative of its members that was adopted in 2007. The paper concludes with an assessment of the extent to which engagement by civil society groups have helped or hindered the accountability of IFAT and offers recommendations for strengthening its relations with civil society in order to close the current accountability gap in its global governance role

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository

redirect
Last time updated on 01/12/2017

This paper was published in Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.