Location of Repository

The governance of the IMF: how a dual board structure could raise the effectiveness and legitimacy of a key global institution

By Christian Thimann, Christian Just and R. (Raymond) Ritter

Abstract

The International Monetary Fund is currently engaged in a reform process to update its activities to the challenges of economic globalisation and establish it firmly as the central institution for international monetary cooperation. Yet, the current reforms may miss this aim because they do not foresee adjusting IMF governance so as to allow the Executive Board to become a forum for true international economic dialogue. Without such a change in governance, however, such economic dialogue is likely to continue moving outside the IMF, and spread in fora such as the G7, G20 or others that do not have universal status.\ud \ud This paper lays out a new proposal to adjust governance to make the IMF more effective in this area. It proposes to create a new smaller Board to deal with global economic issues of a systemic nature, and enlarge the current Board to make more room for developing countries, focusing it on country-related and technical matters, including bilateral surveillance and structural adjustment lending.\ud \ud The implementation of a dual Board structure is obviously challenging from an institutional point of view, and the paper discusses these challenges in detail. Yet, it would allow the IMF to be more effective and carry greater legitimacy vis-à-vis developing economies and at the same time play a more central role in international economic consultation and cooperation that in recent years has increasingly drifted towards the G-groups such as the G7, G20, G24 and other fora

Topics: HG, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1874

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006b): “Through the Looking Glass: Reform of the International Institutions”, Speech at the Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies,
  2. (2006). A Strategy for IMF Reform, doi
  3. An Evaluation of the IMF’s Multilateral Surveillance”, Independent Evaluation Office of the IMF, doi
  4. (1999). External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance – Report by a Group of Independent Experts”, doi
  5. (2005). IMF Governance and the Political Economy of a Consolidated European Seat”,
  6. (2006). IMF Reform: Comments on the Address of the Managing Director of the IMF at the book release meeting for Reforming the IMF for the 21 st Century, Institute for International Economics,
  7. (2005). Improving IMF Governance and Increasing the Influence of Developing Countries doi
  8. (2006). Internal Governance and IMF Performance”,
  9. (2001). Making the IMF and the World Bank more Accountable”, doi
  10. (2001). Organizational reform and the expansion of the South’s voice at the Fund”,
  11. (2006). Reform of the International Monetary Fund,” Speech at the Indian Council for
  12. (2006). Running the IMF – Reducing Political Bias and Increasing Independence”,
  13. (2006). The Evolving International Monetary Order and the Need for an Evolving IMF”, Speech at
  14. (2003). The Governance of the International Monetary Fund, doi
  15. (2005). The IMF – Mandate, Means and Governance in a Changing World”, Speech at the IMF-Deutsche Bundesbank Symposium “The IMF in a Changing World”,
  16. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions”, doi
  17. The Managing Director’s Report on Implementing the Fund’s Medium-Term Strategy”,
  18. The Managing Director’s Report on the Fund’s Medium-Term Strategy”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.