Location of Repository

Collective action problems and regional integration in ASEAN

By Hidetaka Yoshimatsu

Abstract

This article examines the states' attempt to overcome collective action problems for promoting regional integration, by highlighting such attempts by the members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). It considers two kinds of collective action problems: collaboration games where actors are lured to defect from an agreement in order to obtain short-term gains, and coordination gains where actors face difficulty in reaching an agreement on which of multiple points will be chosen. This article argues that although ASEAN countries have not intended to establish a supranational body to resolve collective action problems, they have gradually developed feasible enforcement mechanisms by intensifying the centralised nature of the regional organisation. It also contends that some member states began to play a one "focal point" role in resolving coordination problems resulting from accelerated regional integration and market liberalisation, and the resolution of coordination problems has been pursued in a framework where extra-regional countries and environments play a significant role

Topics: HF, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1907

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). ASEAN pawaa: Ajia taiheiyo no chukaku he [ASEAN Power: Toward a Centre of the Asia-Pacific], Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai,
  2. (2005). ASEAN: Narrowing the Development Gap. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, doi
  3. (1983). Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World”, doi
  4. (1985). Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes”, doi
  5. (1981). Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, doi
  6. (2005). European Integration: A Model for South-East Asia?”, doi
  7. (2002). From ‘Neighbourhood Watch Group’ to Community?”, doi
  8. (1991). Global Communications and National Power”, doi
  9. (2005). Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) Work Plan for the CLMV Countries: Progress Report as at 15
  10. (2003). Integrating Southeast Asia’s economies”, McKinsey Quarterly, 2004-1:36-47 Severino, Rodolfo C. “Regional Integration in Europe and in Asia”,
  11. (2005). Kanbojia unyu sekuta ni okeru enjo kyocho [Aid coordination in the transport sector in Cambodia], Tokyo: Kokusai Kaihatsu Kenkyu
  12. (1990). Overview”, In Europe 1992: An American Perspective, edited by Gary Clyde Hufbauer. doi
  13. (2003). Realizing the ASEAN Economic Community by 2020: doi
  14. (1992). Recasting the European Bargain”, World Politics 42, no.1 doi
  15. (1992). Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: The ERT and EC doi
  16. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, doi
  17. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: doi
  18. (2005). The New Economic Bilateralism in Southeast Asia: RegionConvergent or Region-Divergent?”, doi
  19. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict, doi
  20. Torsten Strulik Knowledge politics in the field of global finance? The emergence of a cognitive approach in banking supervision 196/06 March Mark Beeson and Hidetaka Yoshimatsu Asia’s Odd Men Out:
  21. (1997). United Germany in integrating Europe”, In Tamed power: Germany doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.