Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Globalisation, regionalisation & the Americas. The free trade area of the Americas: fuelling the 'race to the bottom'?

By A. (Alexander) MacLeod


The framing of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) over a period of ten years is a project on a unique scale and with a unique significance. According to Robert Devlin, the FTAA is undoubtedly the most ambitious collective economic initiative in the history of the Western Hemisphere. The intention is to create the biggest market in the world, comprising 800 million people and a GDP of US$11 - 14 trillion. If it is successful, it will also bring to conclusion ten years of negotiation and bilateral and sub-regional trade agreements that will be essentially subsumed in the FTAA. However, prospects for finalising the Agreement look slim as negotiations on the scope and scale of the FTAA have reached an impasse when the January 2005 deadline passed without consensus. The failure to complete the Agreement raises significant questions about the raison d’etre of regional agreements, the relationship between globalisation and regionalism, and the balance between free trade and social interests. The debate surrounding the FTAA presents a particularly interesting illustration of the arguments for and against free trade agreements generally -- first, for their historic place in the global pattern and context of regionalisation within the Americas; second, for the issues raised by the current impasse. This paper explores the inherent flaws in the FTAA and how it might have potentially negative impacts on the region in terms of social, economic, environmental and political outcomes. The first part of this paper looks at the global and regional context of the FTAA and the growth of regionalism, mediated by the US and the EU. The second part looks at how regionalism and free trade, working through the FTAA, are seen to have serious drawbacks, which have generated a range of opposition, and led to the frustration of negotiations. This paper also questions whether, given the experience of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Area), the model itself is flawed; and whether the FTAA, in its far wider scope and significance for the Americas, will in effect fuel a ‘race to the bottom’. The final question is whether the situation can be retrieved, and whether changes to the FTAA, enabling it to promote economic, social and human development, will in fact be put in place

Topics: HB, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). A Dynamic Evaluation of the Effects of a Free Trade Area of the Americas: An Intertemporal World Model,’ doi
  2. (2004). Asymmetries and Cooperation in the FTAA’,
  3. (2002). Challenges Confronting the Free Trade Area of the Americas’, Policy Paper, Canadian Foundation for the Americas (FOCAL),
  4. (2002). Civil Society and Inclusion in New Regionalism: Can Civil Society Influence a Trade-led Agenda?’ Paper prepared for the second annual conference of the Euro-Latin trade network, Florence,
  5. (1997). Common Market of the Southern Cone: MERCOSUR: The Impact of Economic Integration: A Case study.
  6. (2002). Deputy Director General DG Trade, European Commission, ‘New Regionalism and Global Economic Governance’, published in UNU/CRIS e-Working papers,
  7. (2000). Development and Democracy in the Southern Cone: Imperatives for US Policy in South America , doi
  8. (2002). Directorate-General for External Relations, European Union relations with the United States, (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
  9. (2000). Estados Unidos, ALCA: Globalización y Regionalización en el Cambio de Siglo, (Findación de Cultura Universitaria,
  10. (2001). Exiting the Whirlpool: U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Latin America and the Caribbean , doi
  11. (1995). Expanding NAFTA: Economic Effects of doi
  12. (1996). Free Trade Agreements Arnaud, G, MERCOSUR, Unión Europea, Nafta y los procesos de Integración Regional, (Abeledo-Perrot, Buenos Aires,
  13. (2004). Free Trade for the Americas?: The United States' push for the FTAA Agreement, (Zed Books, doi
  14. (2000). FTAA: A Gamble Staked against Migrant Communities, (Polaris Institute,
  15. (2002). Globalisation for the Common Good, doi
  16. (1995). Globalism and World Economic Order,
  17. (1999). House of Commons. doi
  18. (2002). Integración Asimétrica y Convergencia Económica en las Américas, (Universidad Nacional de Colombia,
  19. (2004). La Zone de Libre Exchange dans Amériques : Les Etats-Unis Seuls Maîtres à Bord?’ In,
  20. (1995). Liberalization in the Western Hemisphere: New Challenges in the Design of a Free Trade Agreement,’ doi
  21. (2004). Moving on from NAFTA to the FTAA?: The Impact of Trade Agreements on Social and Public Health Conditions in the Americas’, in Revista Pan Americana de Salud Publica/Pan America Public Heath Review, doi
  22. (1995). NAFTA and Trade Liberalization in the Americas, doi
  23. (1995). NAFTA: Poverty and Free Trade in Mexico,
  24. (1993). North American Free Trade Agreement: Opportunities and Challenges (Macmillan, doi
  25. (2005). Political Attaché, Venezuelan Embassy,
  26. (2002). Regional Development and Cooperation on the US/Mexican Border’, in,
  27. (2001). Regional Trade Agreements for MERCOSUR: the FTAA and the FTA with the European Union’, Paper prepared for presentation at the Conference “Impacts of Trade Liberalisation
  28. (2004). Regionalism and International Relations Aggarwal, V and Fogarty E, (eds) EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalization,
  29. (2003). Regionalism and Regional Policy in the European
  30. (1995). Regionalism and the global economy : the case of
  31. (1999). Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?, (Centre for Economic Policy Research,
  32. (2004). Social Protection and Inclusive Trade: Strengthening the Sources of Convergence’
  33. (2000). Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of US-Latin American Relations, doi
  34. (1976). The Andean Pact, A Model of Economic Integration for Developing Countries, doi
  35. (2004). The Environmental Dimension of Economic Integration: The FTAA and Beyond’
  36. (1995). The EU: Understanding the Brussels Process, doi
  37. (2000). The Free Trade Area of the Americas and MERCOSUR-EU Free Trade Processes: Can they Learn Something from Each Other?’, Inter American Development Bank,
  38. (2004). The FTAAs Impact on Democratic Governance’
  39. (2002). The New Agenda for International Relations, (Polity, doi
  40. The United States and its Enterprise for the Americas’,
  41. (2002). What is Globalisation? (Polity, Cambridge,
  42. (2000). What Should the World Bank Think About the Washington Consensus?’ World Bank Research Observer. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.