Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Rationality, irrationality and economic cognition

By John Whalley

Abstract

This paper contrasts the modern use of the assumption that rationality as reflected in simple models of utility and profit maximization guides individual economic behaviour to literature both between 1890 and 1930 which sharply challenged the use of such an assumption and later literature in economic psychology from Herbert Simon onwards which sees economic (and other) cognitive processes in different ways. Some of the earlier literature proposed objective and operational notions of rationality based on the availability of information, ability to reason (cognitive skills), and even morality. Learning played a major role in individuals achieving what was referred to as complete rationality. I draw on these ideas, and suggest that developing models in which economic agents have degrees (or levels) of economic cognition which are endogenously determined could both change the perceptions economists have on policy matters and incorporate findings from recent economic psychology literature. This would remove the issue of whether economic agents are dichotomously rational or irrational, and instead introduce continuous metrics of cognition into economic thinking. Such an approach also poses the two policy issues of whether raising levels of economic cognition should be an objective of policy and whether policy interventions motivated by departures from full economic cognition should be analyzed

Topics: HG
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1969

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1955). A doi
  2. (1981). A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge,
  3. (1947). Administrative Behaviour,
  4. (1995). Advances in Behavioural Finance, Russell Sage Foundation, doi
  5. (2001). Anthropology: Theoretical Practice in Culture and Society,
  6. (1992). Beyond “The Original Affluent Society”: doi
  7. (2002). Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics," Nobel Prize Lecture,
  8. (1924). Economic Motives: A Study in the Psychological Foundations of Economic Theory, with Some Reference to Other Social Sciences, Cambridge: doi
  9. Evaluation, and Hedonics: A Brain Processes Model of Decision-Making,” Mimeo,
  10. (1976). Falling in Love: The Psychology of the Romantic Emotion,
  11. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” doi
  12. (1986). Human Desire and Economic Satisfaction: Essays on the Frontiers of Economics. doi
  13. (1908). Introduction to Social Psychology, doi
  14. (1962). Irrational Behaviour and Economic Theory,” doi
  15. (1988). Lessons from General Equilibrium Models"
  16. (1986). Love as the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction, doi
  17. (1971). Manual of Political Economy. Translated by
  18. (1993). Materialism and Life Satisfaction: A Meta Analysis,”
  19. (1995). Microeconomic Theory,
  20. (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality: Economic Analysis and Public Policy. doi
  21. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory, a Critique of Applications in Political Science. doi
  22. (1926). Primitive Trade, Its Psychology and Economics, doi
  23. (1961). Principles of Economics. doi
  24. (2004). Psychology and Consumer Culture, doi
  25. (1991). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, doi
  26. (1919). Relation of Recent Psychological Developments to Economic Theory,” doi
  27. (1972). Stone Age Economics, doi
  28. (2001). Sublime Simon: The Consistent Vision of Economic Psychology’s Nobel Laureate,” doi
  29. (1993). The Deadweight Loss of
  30. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour,
  31. (1991). The Excess Burden of Taxation in the United States,"
  32. (1969). The Human Zoo.
  33. (1976). The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. doi
  34. (1924). The Nature of Love, London,
  35. (1982). The Rules of the Sociological Method. Translated by W.D. doi
  36. (1871). The Theory of Political doi
  37. (1999). Why do People Vote?: An Experiment in

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.