Location of Repository

The fate of territorial engineering: mechanisms of territorial power and post-liberal forms of international governance

By Grahame Thompson


Does there exist a genuine threat to the continuation of a broadly liberal international (and domestic) order, driven by the re-emergence of religious and secular fundamentalisms? This paper assesses this issue in the context of, first the rise of territorial power and then its fate in a period of globalization and the revival of religious intolerance. The twin concepts of sovereign-power and bio-power are deployed to investigate the emergence of territorial engineering in the 18th century. A key feature of modern fundamentalisms is that they promote and trade-off the deterritorialization of social, political, cultural and economic activity. It is argued that this is a manifestation of a new form of ‘spiritual martial power’. The risks associated with these developments should not be over-exaggerated but they exists nonetheless. If this is the case, the problem becomes one of how to re-territorializes the activities and disputes engendered by this reappearance and re-emergence of spiritual martial power with its link to religious fundamentalism. Here the argument is that this requires a re-examination of the nature of international borders, and indeed a re-emphasis on their role, not just in respect to containing disorder and restoring the capacity for governance, but also as a way of re-configuring international toleration and of righting a wrong

Topics: JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1972

Suggested articles



  1. (1999). Dis-Agreement: Politics and Philosophy,
  2. (1996). Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault, doi
  3. (2000). Empire, doi
  4. (2001). Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, doi
  5. (2003). Foundations of the Secular: Christianity, doi
  6. (2004). Fundamentalist World: The New Dark Age of Dogma,
  7. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, doi
  8. (2003). How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West, doi
  9. (2002). Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror, London: Hurst and Co.
  10. (2003). Law and Power in the Islamic World, doi
  11. (2003). Limits to Globalization, Cambridge: Polity Press. 25 doi
  12. (1997). On Toleration, doi
  13. (1985). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, doi
  14. (1965). Repressive tolerance’ in
  15. (2004). Review essay: Michel Foucault, society must be defended: Lectures at the College de doi
  16. (2003). Society Must Be Defended” (Lectures at the College de France 1975-76), doi
  17. (1997). Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles, Cambridge; doi
  18. (2003). Terror and Liberalism, doi
  19. (2003). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, doi
  20. (2003). Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill, doi
  21. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, doi
  22. (2002). The Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihads and Modernity, doi
  23. (2004). The Classifying and Value-filtering doi
  24. (1981). The Distribution of Membership’
  25. (2003). The future of political studies’ doi
  26. (1978). The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction, doi
  27. (2003). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, doi
  28. (1967). The Rise of Toleration,
  29. (2003). The Size of Nations, doi
  30. (1997). The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience,
  31. (2003). Toleration and Identity: Foundations in Early Modern Thought, doi
  32. (2002). Toleration and the Art of Governance: How is it possible to "live together" in a fragmenting international system?'
  33. (2004). Understanding Terror Networks, doi
  34. (2004). Wealth and technology in historical perspective’

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.