Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An economic assessment of the accession of the Central and Eastern European countries to the EU single market

By T. Huw Edwards


In 2004 the European Union is due to incorporate 10 new members, mostly from theCentral and Eastern European Countries (CECs). Trade between the EU and CECs currently falls well short of that between EU countries, and if we assume this pattern reflects both tariffs and a resource cost due to regulatory differences, then 1997 trade patterns would imply such costs are 7-15% on trade between the EU and CECs. Elimination/harmonisation of remaining tariffs is likely to bring small welfare gains to new entrants. By contrast entry to the Single Market looks far more significant: after both tariff union and entry to the Single Market total trade volumes between the EU and CECs could rise by 50-100% (much more in some commodities), while welfare gains in the CECs could be of the order of 11.5-20%, larger than the previous two studies have suggested. Welfare gains within the EU are around 0.4% of GDP, with all regions gaining but Germany gaining most. Gains are greater where capital is fully mobile

Topics: HC, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). (2003)(1): ‘Quality Standards under Classical Oligopoly and Trade:
  2. (2003)(2): ‘History Matters for Import Demand: a Match-Searching Model of Inter-Firm Trade’.
  3. (1995). An economic assessment of the integration of Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland into the European Union’.In S.W. Black ‘Europe’s Economy Looks East’ doi
  4. and J.S.Wilson (eds 2001): Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade. doi
  5. DeMooij and Nahuis (2001): ‘EU Enlargement: Implications for Countries and Industries’. Report CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  6. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’ In J.A.Frankel (ed): The Regionalization of the World Economy, doi
  7. (1997). EU enlargement: Small costs for the west, big gains for the east’.Economic Policy doi
  8. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns’,
  9. (2001). paper in Maskus and Wilson (op cit).
  10. (1989). The Generalised Gravity Equation: Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory of International Trade’. doi
  11. (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: a Reappraisal’. doi
  12. (1999). The role of standards in trade’ doi
  13. (1989). The theoretical relationship between a Dixit-Stiglitz model, with monopolistic competition between differentiated goods g, each produced in one country c only, is well-established since Bergstrand

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.