Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

New regionalism and the construction of global order

By Manuela Spindler


The paper introduces a framework for understanding the novelty of regionalism (new regionalism) by relating it to processes of structural change led by agency, acting according to new concepts and ideas. It uncovers the phenomenon as part of change in the relationship between political authority and the logic of the market, that is at the heart of the global political economy. It will be argued that with new regionalism, the predominant concept and thus logic and content of the old regionalism found in 'embedded liberalism' is in the process of undergoing a fundamental change. This is to a great deal due to the activities of global business actors as globalising forces: they 'infuse' the logic of the market into traditional, old style regionalism. The argument is put forward that global business not only is 'the master of the market', meaning that it creates regionalised and globalised patterns of economic transactions due to economic firm strategies. As a powerful actor, global business increasingly creates and promotes new concepts of the political framework wherein their activities should be embedded. These are concepts that envision a regionalised world that sharply contrasts to the one we used to live in so far. Two cases will support the argument: the role global business actors - acting via the European Round Table of Industrialists – play with regard to the European Single Market and similar activities of global players within the APEC process. At the end, the paper will discuss a trend new regionalism might take: towards a world in which regions converge on the model of the competition region

Topics: JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). (2000b) ABAC Recommends Firm APEC Commitment to WTO and New Talks Round.
  2. (1997). (ed) The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. doi
  3. (1999). (eds) Private Authority and International Affairs. doi
  4. (2000). Adam Ma'anit and Erik Wesselius
  5. (1998). APEC and Asia's Crisis'.
  6. (1994). APEC Economic Leaders Declaration of Common Resolve', doi
  7. (1997). Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation. Organisation and Progress, at http://www.
  8. (1995). Critical Political Economy', doi
  9. (1998). Open Regionalism: The Nature of Asia Pacific Integration',
  10. (2000). Press Release by
  11. (1999). Private Authority and International Affairs', in: Cutler et al doi
  12. (1999). Regionalization in Response to Polarizing Globalization', in: Hettne et al (eds), International Political Economy. Understanding Global Disorder,
  13. (2000). Restructuring the Political Arena: Globalization and the Paradoxes of the Competition State',
  14. (1995). Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: The ERT and EC doi
  15. (1985). Table of Industrialists doi
  16. (1999). The Contours and Significance of Private Authority in International Affairs', in: Cutler et al doi
  17. (1993). The Globalization of Business. doi
  18. (2000). Trade Blocs: The Beauty or the Beast in Theory?',
  19. (2000). What is Globalization? Cambridge:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.