Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What can the developing countries infer from the Uruguay Round models for the Millennium Round positions?

By John Whalley


This paper discusses the results from general equilibrium trade models executed towards the end of the Uruguay Round, reporting both aggregate and regional gains. These results were generated some 5 years ago, and were important to the debates at the end of the Uruguay Round as to what would be the foregone gains were the Round not to conclude. The paper argues that there are substantial, and at times hard to explain inconsistencies across model results. One model shows most of the gains come from agricultural liberalization, another from textiles, and yet another from tariff cuts. One model shows developing countries account for around 10% of the total gain, another shows them to gain over 50%. One model shows developing countries losing from elimination of the MFA, another shows them as large gainers. One model shows that imperfectly competitive and scale economy effects double global gains, another shows almost no impact. These differences occur even where similar data sets, and benchmark years are used, and are hard to explain on the basis of parametric specifications for models seemingly used though these are frequently poorly exposited. The paper also discusses the verification of models relative to behaviour since the Round concluded, expressing skepticism as to its feasibility for reasons set out in the paper. It also attempts to discuss what, if any, are the implications for the developing countries, and the possible ways forward in making these models more useable in the Millennium Round

Topics: HF, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). The Choice of Structural Model in Trade and doi
  2. (1995). The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, World Bank Discussion Paper #307.
  3. (1996). The Liberalization of Services Trade: doi
  4. (1994). The Uruguay Round: A Global General Equilibrium Assessment”
  5. (1995). Assessing the Uruguay Round”
  6. (1996). The Uruguay Round: a numerically based qualitative assessment”
  7. (1996). Assessing agricultural tariffication under the Uruguay Round “
  8. (1996). Quantifying the Uruguay Round” in doi
  9. (1996). Liberalizing Manufactures Trade in a Changing World Economy”
  10. (1995). Tentative First Steps: An Assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Services” doi
  11. (1996). Tariffication in the Uruguay Round: How Much Liberalization?” The World Economy, doi
  12. (1995). An Evaluation of the Performance of an doi
  13. (1991). The Value of a Uruguay Round Success” The World Economy (vol.14, doi
  14. (1995). A Uruguay Round Success?” The World Economy (vol.18, doi
  15. (1994). World Trade Reform: Do Developing Countries Gain or Lose? ODI
  16. (1998). The Uruguay Round and its Impact on Developing Countries: An Overview of Model Results”
  17. (1992). Applying General Equilibrium, doi
  18. (1986). General Equilibrium Trade Policy Modelling, doi
  19. (1999). Pharmaceutical Patents, Prices, and Welfare Losses: A Simulation Study of Policy Options for India Under the WTO TRIPS Agreement” doi
  20. (1985). Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas, doi
  21. (1986). Hidden Challenges in Recent General Equilibrium Exercises”
  22. (1995). Overview of Development doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.