Location of Repository

Crises in Asia or crisis of globalisation?

By Heribert Dieter

Abstract

The crises in Southeast and East Asia have started a new round of debate on the benefits and disadvantages of globalisation. We have to ask whether the crises in Asia were the result of failures in national economic policy or whether they were the consequence of ill-constructed global financial markets. It can be concluded that the crises were caused by a number of factors, both internal and external, but that the decisive shifts came from actors on international financial markets as well as from the IMF, whose activities fuelled the crises.\ud \ud To avoid a repetition, a number of options are discussed, including the introduction of a currency regime between the major players in the world economy as well as unilateral measures to defend developing countries’ economies against volatile international financial markets

Topics: HG, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2110

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1998). (1998a): Currency Crisis. Mimeo [www.web.mit.edu]. Februar
  2. (1998). (1998a): Shared Response to the Market Shocks? The World Today,
  3. (1998). (1998a): Sound Finance and Sustainable Development in Asia. Address to the Asia Development Forum.
  4. (1998). (1998a): The Asian Crisis. A View from the IMF. Address at the Midwinter Conference of the Bankers Association for Foreign Trade.
  5. (1998a): The IMF and its Programmes in Asia. Remarks at the Council on Foreign Relations.
  6. (1998b): Bad Private-Sector Decisions. The Wall Street Journal,
  7. (1998b): The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment. doi
  8. (1998b): The Role of the IMF: Past, present and Future. Remarks at the Annual Meeting of the Bretton Woods Committee [www.imf.org].
  9. (1998). (1998b): Will Asia bounce back? Speech for Credit Suisse First Boston, Hong Kong [www.web.mit.edu],
  10. (1998c): Saving Asia: It’s Time to Get Radical. Fortune Investor,
  11. (1998). A Three-Step Remedy for Asia"s Financial Flu.
  12. (1998). Asia in Crisis: An Interview. doi
  13. (1997). Asia's Reemergence. Foreign Affairs, doi
  14. (1998). Aussenpolitische und oekonomische Konsequenzen der Asienkrise: Verlierer Japan, Gewinner China? Internationale Politik, Oktober
  15. (1988). Boom and Bust. doi
  16. (1998). China and the Asian Contagion. doi
  17. (1998). Dealing with the Asian Crisis. doi
  18. (1998). Der globale Irrsinn. Nicht Rußland, aber das heiße Geld der Spekulanten kann eine weltweite Wirtschaftskrise auslösen. Die Zeit,
  19. (1998). Der Rat der falschen Freunde. Der Internationale Währungsfonds ist mit schuld an Rußlands Niedergang. Die Zeit,
  20. (1998). Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) doi
  21. (1995). Die mexikanische Krise und ihre regionalen Auswirkungen.
  22. (1997). Financial Sector Weaknesses are Roiling Asian Currencies.
  23. Fund (IMF 1997b): World Economic Outlook, Interim Assessment. doi
  24. (1998). Fund (IMF 1998a): The IMF’s Response to the Asian Crisis,
  25. (1998). Fund (IMF 1998b): Directions of Trade Statitistics.
  26. (1998). Future of Asia in a Globalised and Deregulated World. Speech at the Conference “The Future of Asia”,
  27. (1998). Gestalt Shift: From “Miracle” to “Cronyism” in the Asian Crisis. doi
  28. Heribert (1998a): Im Tandem zu mehr Stabilität? Der Euro und die Chancen für eine transatlantische Währungskooperation.
  29. Heribert (1998b): Die Asienkrise und der Internationale Währungsfonds. INEF-Report Nr.
  30. Heribert (1998c): APEC’s slide to peripheral Pacific status. The Canberra Times,
  31. (1998). Heribert (1998d): Die Asienkrise: Ursachen, Konsequenzen und die Rolle des Internationalen Währungsfonds.
  32. (1998). Im Strudel der japanischen Krise. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
  33. (1998). IMF Reports Plan Backfired, Worsening Indonesia’s Woes.
  34. (1998). Japan’s Financial Mess. doi
  35. (1998). Keine Angst vor der Globalisierung. Wohlstand und Arbeit für alle. doi
  36. (1990). National Saving and the World Economy.
  37. (1998). Refocusing the IMF. Foreign Affairs, March/April doi
  38. (1989). Resolving the International Debt Crisis. In: Sachs, Jeffrey D. (Hrsg.): Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance. Volume 1: The International Financial System. Chicago und London: doi
  39. (1997). Settlements (BIS) (1998a): 68 th
  40. (1998). Settlements (BIS) (1998b): International Banking and Financial Market Developments. Basle,
  41. (1998). Settlements (BIS) (1998c): Framework for the Evaluation of Internal Control Systems. Basle,
  42. (1997). Spekulation contra Entwicklungspolitik: Eine Analyse der ostasiatischen Währungskrise. Internationale Politik und
  43. (1998). Testimony before the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, United States House of Representatives, doi
  44. (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Dynamics and Prospects. Paper presented at the conference on “Assessing the Asian Crisis: Economics, Politics and Society”, doi
  45. (1998). The Capital Myth. The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Trade in Dollars. doi
  46. (1998). The East Asian Financial Crisis: Back to the Future? Paper presented at a seminar on "Impacts of the Asian Currency Crisis on Europe"s Growth Prospects", Brüssel, Februar
  47. (1998). The Financial Crisis in Asia. Statement before the International Relations Committee, United States House of Representatives,
  48. (1991). The Growth of Australia's Foreign Debt.
  49. (1997). The IMF is a power unto itself. Financial Times,
  50. (1997). The Real Lesson from Asia. Financial Times,
  51. (1998). The real problem with capitalism is the markets. The Independent Weekend Review),
  52. (1997). The Wrong Medicine for Asia.
  53. (1998). Who needs the IMF? The Wall Street Journal,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.