Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Not just a "second order" problem in a wider economic crisis: systemic challenges for the global trading system

By Richard A. Higgott


Reform of the multilateral trade regime is not simply a second order problem within a wider economic crisis. The completion of the Doha Round may be a second order question but the global trade regime faces a series of broader systemic challenges beyond the completion of the current negotiations. This paper identifies five challenges: (i) a marked reduction in popular support for open markets in major OECD countries; (ii) the stalling of a transition from one global economic equilibrium to another; (iii) a lack of clarity and agreement on the agenda and objectives for the WTO as we move deeper into the 21st century; (iv) the demand for fairness and justice in the governance of the WTO—the 'legitimacy' question and (v) the rise of regional preferentialism as a challenge to multilateralism. Failure to address these challenges will represent not only a fundamental question for the future of the WTO as the guarantor of the norms and rules of the global trade regime specifically, but also the ability to establish greater coherence in global economic governance overall when its need is arguably greater than at any time since the depression years of the 20th century inter-war period

Topics: HF, JZ
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Rewstraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. doi
  2. (2009). Aid for Trade and the “Missing Middle” of the World Trade Organisation’. doi
  3. (2005). All the way with the US: Australia, United States and Free Trade.
  4. (2007). Annual Report. Geneva. World Trade Organization. doi
  5. (2007). Beyond Tariffs: Multilaterising Deeper RTA Commitments’. Multilateralizing Regionalism, doi
  6. (2007). China and the Global Political Economy. doi
  7. (2009). Critical Mass as an Alternative Framework for Multilateral Trade Negotiations’.
  8. (2003). Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation’. doi
  9. (2008). Getting Over Those Doha Blues’, Geneva. The Graduate Institute. VoxEU.Org Evenett, Simon.
  10. (2006). Globalization’s bystanders: Does trade liberalization hurt countries that do not participate?. doi
  11. (2009). Higgott: Not Just a "Second Order" Problem in a Wider Economic Crisis Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, doi
  12. (2004). In Defence of PTAs: From Purity to Pragmatism in Southeast Asia’. doi
  13. (2005). India as a New Global Leader, London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
  14. (2008). India: The Emerging Giant. doi
  15. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. doi
  16. (2006). Mulilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’. The World doi
  17. (2005). Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’. doi
  18. (2009). Process DriveSrs in Trade Negotiations: The Role of Research in the Path to Grounding and Contextualising’.
  19. (2005). The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism’ Working Paper No. 9. Warwick University: EU FP6 Network of Excellence on Global Governance, Regionalisation and Regulation: The Role of the EU (GARNET) at Lamy,
  20. (1995). The Dangerous Drift to Preferential Trade Agreements. Washington DC:
  21. (2004). The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial Meeting: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions’. The World doi
  22. (2008). The Global Power Elite and the World they are Making. doi
  23. (2007). The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? University of Warwick, doi
  24. (2008). The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened and What to Do About It. doi
  25. (2006). The World Bank and Governance: A Decade of Reform and Reaction. doi
  26. (1997). Unequal Trade: The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. doi
  27. (2008). Using Negotiation to Promote Legitimacy: An Assessment of Proposals for Reforming the WTO’. doi
  28. (2004). Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization’. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.