Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The micro-evolution and transfer of conceptual knowledge about negative numbers

By Amanda Ruth Simpson

Abstract

Children’s failure to re-use knowledge will continue to be problematic until processes that contribute to conceptual growth are better understood.\ud The notion that conceptual knowledge, soundly constructed and reinforced, forms the basis of future learning, as the learner uses it unproblematically to make sense of new situations in related areas, is appealing. This thesis will show this to be an overly simplistic view of learning, failing to take sufficient account of fine-grained processes that contribute to the micro-evolution of knowledge and of connections between cognition and other factors. Much previous research focused on abstraction as key to learning. This thesis examines the role of abstraction in the development of mathematics concepts by children aged 8-9 years, using negative numbers as a window on their development of knowledge in a new domain. The assumption, prevalent in the literature, that abstraction is a requirement for transfer of knowledge is questioned.\ud Three research questions are explored:\ud 1. What resources shape the nature of transfer and the\ud growth of knowledge about negative numbers?\ud 2. What is the role of the interplay of resources in the microtransfer of knowledge about negative numbers?\ud 3. What is the relationship between abstracting and\ud transferring knowledge about negative numbers?\ud Methodology is based on a case study approach, initially recording the work of 3 small groups of children throughout a series of tasks and using progressive focusing techniques to create two case studies which are analysed in depth.\ud The thesis reports how the extent of conceptual development about negative numbers was influenced by interpersonal and intrapersonal learner characteristics, and describes a complex interplay between cognitive and affective factors. Micro-transfer and intermediate abstractions, and reinforcement of the connections that these construct, are found to be crucial for conceptual growth, though abstraction is not a condition for transfer at the micro-level

Topics: LB1501, QA
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2240

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). A Comparative Study of Cognitive Units in Mathematics Thinking. In
  2. (2006). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism Norwood,
  3. (2002). Abstraction: Theories about 307 the emergence of knowledge structures”.
  4. (1996). Beginning learning negative
  5. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: the importance of knowing-to act in the moment. doi
  6. (2005). Camtasia Studio, Version 3.0 www.techsmith.com [accessed 18.12.08] 317
  7. (1983). Children’s Algorithms as Schemes. doi
  8. (1988). Cognition in practice. doi
  9. (1985). Comparison of models aimed at teaching signed integers.” In Streefland,
  10. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. doi
  11. (1993). Constructivism in the computer age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  12. (2007). Cool Cash” card confusion. In Manchester Evening News 3/11/2007. http://www.mancheste reveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1022757_cool_cash_card_confusion [accessed 1.12.2008]
  13. (1996). Dictionary (2008) http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50000894?single=1&query_type=word &queryword=abstraction&first=1&max_to_show=10 [accessed 14.4.08] Papert, S
  14. (2005). Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line?
  15. (1999). Education and Employment /Qualifications and Curriculum Authority doi
  16. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency,
  17. (2005). Efficiency and Innovation in Transfer.
  18. (2005). Framing the Transfer Problem. In Jose P Mestre (ed) Transfer of learning from a modern multidiscplinary perspective, A Volume in Current Perspectives on Cognition, Learning and Instruction.Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp vii-xxvi
  19. (2002). Fundamental cycles of cognitive growth,
  20. (1994). Investigation of a Model Based on the Neutralization of Opposites to Teach Integer Addition and Subtraction.” In da
  21. (1991). Levels of Knowledge About Signed Numbers: Effects of Age and Ability.” In Furingheti,
  22. (2004). McDonald’s vs Father Christmas.
  23. (1978). Mind in Society. doi
  24. (1992). Model construction operators. doi
  25. (2004). Numbers and Maps: The Dynamic Interaction of Internal Meanings and External Resources in Use.
  26. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding”, doi
  27. (2001). Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts; an explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics. In
  28. (2002). Researching Your Own Practice. The Discipline of Noticing. Routledge Falmer. doi
  29. (1990). Scores and forfeits – An intuitive model for integer arithmetic.” doi
  30. (1996). Teaching for Understanding of Negative Number Concepts and Operations.” Conference paper,
  31. (2001). Teaching Young Children to Make Explicit Their Understanding of Negative Measures and Negative Relations.”
  32. (1997). The Construction of Mathematical Meanings: Connecting the Visual with the Symbolic. doi
  33. (2003). The construction of similarity: Context sensitivity and the transfer of mathematical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  34. (1988). The dynamic structure of everyday life.
  35. (1998). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects. doi
  36. (2002). The Microevolution of Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Randomness. doi
  37. (1999). The National Numeracy Strategy Framework for teaching mathematics from Reception to Year 6. Cambridge.
  38. (1962). Thought and Language. doi
  39. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. doi
  40. (1989). Towards Assessment of Cognitive and Conative Structures in Learning. doi
  41. (1999). Voice, Perspective, Bias and Stance: Applying and Modifying Piageitan Theory in Mathematical Education”. In Leone Burton (ed) “Learning mathematics. From Hierarchies to Netoworks,
  42. (2005). Webkit: A Case Study of Iterative Prototyping of a Tangible User Interface." IEEE Pervasive Computing. Special issue on Rapid Prototyping for Ubiquitous Computing - Oct-Dec doi
  43. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.