Article thumbnail

Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis

By Arild Angelsen, Pamela Jagger, Ronnie Babigumira, Brian Belcher, Nicholas Hogarth, Simone Bauch, Jan Borner, Carsten Smith-Hall and Sven Wunder

Abstract

This paper presents results from a comparative analysis of environmental income from approximately 8000 households in 24 developing countries collected by research partners in CIFOR’s Poverty Environment Network (PEN). Environmental income accounts for 28% of total household income, 77% of which comes from natural forests. Environmental income shares are higher for low-income households, but differences across income quintiles are less pronounced than previously thought. The poor rely more heavily on subsistence products such as wood fuels and wild foods, and on products harvested from natural areas other than forests. In absolute terms environmental income is approximately five times higher in the highest income quintile, compared to the two lowest quintiles

Topics: forests, household income surveys, inequality, poverty
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Year: 2014
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006
OAI identifier: oai:espace.cdu.edu.au:cdu:49364
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://espace.cdu.edu.au/view... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.