Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding the exercise of agency within structural inequality: the case of personal debt

By Michael Orton

Abstract

This article contributes to debates about agency (meaning the behaviour of individuals) and structure, by drawing on empirical research into personal debt. Consideration of debt allows for debate about agency and structure beyond the narrow confines of welfare, and for the examination of agency in relation to citizens at different points in the broader socio-economic structure, not solely poor people. Based on the research findings, themselves grounded in interviewees' experience, the question of why two people in the same material circumstances will have different experiences becomes reframed as why two people whose exercise of agency is the same, face very different outcomes? It is argued that while the research supports a ‘both-and’ rather than ‘either-or’ approach to understanding agency and structure, a ‘both-and’ approach still does not fully capture the experience of interviewees. The key point is that the exercise of agency is overlaid onto structural inequality, and it is understanding the exercise of ‘agency within structure’ that is critical

Topics: HG
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2568

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A regulatory policy for self-disconnection: an examination of the reasons for and implications of pre-payment meter stoppages’, doi
  2. (1999). Agency, modernity and social policy’, doi
  3. (2001). Agency, rationality and social policy’, doi
  4. (2005). An ethic of mutual responsibility? Toward a fuller justification for conditionality in welfare’,
  5. (2007). Assessing the Impact of Advice for People with Debt Problems: Final Report, London: Legal Services Research Centre.
  6. (2008). Assumptive worlds and images of agency: academic social policy in the twentyfirst century?’, doi
  7. (1999). Balancing polarities: developing a new framework for welfare research’,
  8. (1986). Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, doi
  9. (1994). Beyond Left and Right, doi
  10. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis’,
  11. (1999). Changing paradigms of welfare’,
  12. (1992). Credit and Debt: The PSI Report, London: Policy Studies Institute.
  13. (2004). Different interpretations of agency within welfare debates’, doi
  14. (2008). Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights’, doi
  15. (2002). Echoes of Sir Keith? New Labour and the cycle of disadvantage’,
  16. Education and Support Task Force (2007), Developing Capable Citizens: The Role of Public Legal Education, London: Public Legal Education Task Force.
  17. (2004). Government Matters: Welfare Reform in doi
  18. (1988). Indebtedness’, doi
  19. (2004). Irresponsible citizens? New Labour, citizenship and the case of non-payment of local taxation’, doi
  20. (1997). Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy’, doi
  21. (1984). Losing Ground, doi
  22. (1973). Making People Pay, doi
  23. (1995). Making Welfare Work, doi
  24. (2003). Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, doi
  25. (1997). Postmodernity and Its Discontents, doi
  26. (1989). Rich Law, Poor Law: Different Responses to Tax and Supplementary Benefit Fraud, Milton Keynes: doi
  27. (2004). Rising levels of household debt – how concerned should we be?’,
  28. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, doi
  29. (2006). Struggling to Pay Council Tax: A New Perspective on the Debate about Local Taxation,
  30. (2007). Tackling Over-Indebtedness: Annual Report
  31. (1990). The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  32. (2007). The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, doi
  33. (1994). The Homeless, doi
  34. (2004). The unknown Titmuss’, doi
  35. (2000). Welfare Rights and Responsibilities, doi
  36. (2005). Worried sick: the experience of debt problems and their relationship with health, illness and disability’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.