Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Community participation in health improvement programmes: a case study of tensions between policy and practice

By Andrea Jane Wild

Abstract

This thesis explores the tensions between policy and practice in community participation in Health Improvement Programmes (HImPs). The HImP is used as a vehicle through which partnership working and public participation is health planning in the ‘new NHS’ may be explained,\ud \ud The literature review discusses key theories and models of community participation, power and policy implementation which informed the development of my key research questions and strategy. A review of the global, national and local influences upon a community participation in health planning is supplemented with primary research in the form of a detailed case study of one locality’s response to the national requirement to involve the public in the development of their HImP. A multi-method case study was employed using the following methods of data collection: observation, interviews, questionnaires and documentary analysis.\ud \ud The research presented identifies a number of issues as significant in affecting a locality’s approach to public participation, including: power; the organisational cultures(s) within the HImP partnership; the attitudes and capacity of those charged with developing participatory activities; and the impact of national priorities on local flexibility to respond to community identified priorities.\ud \ud The application of Alford’s (1975) structural interests theory to the findings provides a useful framework for assessing power relations and understanding why the HImP fails to represent community interests in the way that had been hoped.\ud \ud A number of recommendations are made to facilitate participation in health planning in the future, including: the need to address the national culture of risk avoidance; the need for better training in public participation skills for personnel charged with developing participatory opportunities; and the need for a mandatory performance framework related to community participation as a mechanism to ensure that participation issues are given the same attention as other nationally monitored issues

Topics: RA0421
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2669

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A beginner's guide to health services research.
  2. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. "
  3. (2000). A National Review and Analysis of Health Improvement Programmes 1999-2000. London, Health Development Agency.
  4. (1973). A theoretical basis for participatory planning. " doi
  5. (1978). A Theory of Policy Termination. In: The Policy Cycle.
  6. (2000). Accessed 02/12/02. p9-1-Department for International Development
  7. (1996). Accounts of the NHS reforms: macro-, meso- and micro- level perspectives. " doi
  8. (2000). Achieving Nvider participation in strategic health planning: experience from the consultation phase of Liverpool's 'City Health Plan`. " doi
  9. (2000). Active Partners: Benchmarking Community Participatio in Regeneration.
  10. (1995). Agenda, Altematives and Public Policies.
  11. (1998). Analysing Public Policy.
  12. (1999). Area Co-ordination Office
  13. (1999). Association of Hampshire and Isle of Wight (HIOW) Local Authorities
  14. (2000). Auditing Communi1y Involvement: an assessment handbook.
  15. (1999). Authority doi
  16. Authority, Director of Health Development
  17. Authority, Director of Health Development (2000b). Health Action GroUDS: Proposed terms of reference, constitution & working -arrangements. Coventry, Coventry Health Authority.
  18. (2000). Better routes for Partnership.
  19. (1984). Beyond efficiency: the logical underpinnings of administrative principles. " doi
  20. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks,
  21. (1993). Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide for Change. doi
  22. (1978). Citizen participation in America. doi
  23. (1997). Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice. London, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  24. (2002). Citizens'participation in primary healthcare planning: innovative citizenship practice in empirical perspective. " doi
  25. (1999). Closer to home: The case for experiential participation in health refonn. "
  26. (1994). Coming to Conclusions: Power and Interpretation in Researching Young Womerfs Sexuality. In: Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective.
  27. (1999). Cominunijy involvement in health development: a review of the concept and practice. Geneva, World Health Organization.
  28. (1997). Community health care: the limits of countervailing powers to meet the health care needs of the twenty -first century. "
  29. (1998). Community Involvement in Health: From passive recipients to active participants. Aldershoý Ashgate. doi
  30. (1991). Community involvement in health: Why is it necessary? "
  31. (1999). Community participation and citizenship in British health care planning: narratives of power and involvement in the changing welfare state. " doi
  32. (1997). Community participation and urban regeneration in Britain. In: Contested Communities: Experiences, struggles, policies.
  33. (2001). Community Participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge. " Health Policy and Planning doi
  34. (1993). Community Participation in Health: The Politics of Primary Care in Costa Rica. Cambridge, doi
  35. (2001). Conclusion - can partnerships work? In: Partnership Working: Policy and practice. doi
  36. (2001). Conclusion: the complexity of New Labour. In: New Labour in doi
  37. (1980). Content Analysis: an introduction to its methodology. doi
  38. (1999). Contradictions of communily and paradoxes of power.
  39. (1997). Creating participatory structures in local goverrunent. " Local Govemment Policy Making
  40. (2001). Delivering the Third Wgy: The Implementation of Public Policy under the Blair Government'.
  41. (1997). Democracy, Accountability and Consumerism. In: Healthy Choices: Future options for the NHS.
  42. (2000). Developing health improvement programmes: challenges for a new millennium. " doi
  43. (1999). Developing Health Improvement Programmes: Lessons from the first year.
  44. (2003). Do social policies and political context matter for health in the United Kingdom? " doi
  45. (1997). Do the people want power? The social responsibilities of empowering communities. In: Contested Communities: Experiences, struggles, policies.
  46. (1981). Effective Policy- Implementation. doi
  47. (1988). Empowennent education: Friere's ideas adapted to health education. " doi
  48. (1991). Empowerment and oppression: An indissoluble pairing for contemporary social work. " doi
  49. (2002). Engaging Communities in Area-based Regeneration: The Role of Participatory Evaluation. " doi
  50. (1976). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovative progammes. "
  51. (1992). Executive
  52. (1987). Forms and effectiveness of community participation in squatter settlements. "
  53. (1989). Frameworks of Power. doi
  54. (2002). Guest editorial: public and user 'involvement' doi
  55. Health (1998a). A First Class Service. London, The Stationery Office.
  56. Health (1998c). Our Healthier Nation: A Contract for Health. London, The Stationery Office.
  57. Health (1999a). Saving Lives: our Healthier Nation. London, the Stationery Office.
  58. Health (1999b). Planning for Health and Health Care, Health Service Circular 1999/244. London: Department of Health.
  59. Health (2001a). Tackling Health Inequalities: Consultation on a plan for delively.
  60. Health (2001b). Shifting-the Balance of Power within the NHSSecuring Delivery. London,
  61. Health (2001d). The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21 st
  62. Health (2001e). The Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer of the Department of Health: On the State of the Public Health. London, Department of Health. doi
  63. Health (2001t% The report of the Chief Medical Officer's project to strengthen the public health function. doi
  64. (1999). Health Action Zones: Learning to make a difference. htti): //www. ukc. ac. uk/t)ssru accessed 10/08/00.
  65. (2002). Health Action Zones: Lessons from London. Report to the London Health and Social Care Directorate. London,
  66. (1975). Health Care Politics: Ideological and Interest Group Barriers to Reform. doi
  67. Health Education Authority (2000). Community participation for health: A review of good practice in communi1y participation health project§ and initiatives.
  68. (2001). Health Improvement Programme for Croydon
  69. (2000). Health improvement programmes and the public. In: Health Improvement Programmes. doi
  70. (2000). Health Improvement Programmes. doi
  71. (1999). Health ImRrovement Programme for North and Mid Hampshire.
  72. (1999). Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service. doi
  73. (1999). Healthcare users, the public and the consultation industry. In: Reforming healthcare by consent: Involviniz those who
  74. (2001). Hounslow Health Authority
  75. (2002). How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally': the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities. " Policy and Politics doi
  76. (1978). Implementation in a Bureaucracy. doi
  77. (1973). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. doi
  78. (2000). Implementation: Organizational commitment and stakeholders' involvement. In: Health Improvement Prog-rammes.
  79. (1999). Improving HImPs: The Early Lessons.
  80. (2003). Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia. " doi
  81. (2001). Joined-Up Solutions to Address Health inequalities: Analysing Policy, Process and Resource Streams. " doi
  82. (1993). Labyrinth Training and Consultancy
  83. (2003). Latin lessons give a grassroots insight. " Primary Care Report.
  84. (1993). Lay participation in health care decision making: A conceptual framework. " doi
  85. (1984). Leaming from the Field: A Guide from Experience.
  86. (2002). Lords prepare ambush for bill abolishing NHS watchdogs. The Guardian,
  87. (1998). Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain's reformed health service: power and community in an era of decentralisation. " doi
  88. (1998). Managing Public Involvement in Healthcare Purchasing. doi
  89. (2001). Mandatory, mulitidisciplinary education in primary diabetes care. Can it meet the needs of primary care organisations? doi
  90. (1994). Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research. In: Researchina Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective.
  91. (2000). National Perspective. In: Health Improvement Prog-rammes.
  92. (2001). National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. London, The Stationery Office.
  93. (2000). New Labour and the third way in British welfare state: a new and distinctive approach? " Critical Social Polic 20(l): doi
  94. (2001). New Labour, the third way and social welfare: 'phase two' and beyond. " doi
  95. (2001). New Labour: a study in ambiguity from a position of =bivalence. " doi
  96. (1998). New Labour. Politics after Thatcherism. Cambridge, doi
  97. of Health (1998b). Health Improvement Programmes: Supporting Guidance Health Service Circular Supporting Guidance 1998/167. London,
  98. (1996). Paradigms lost: toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. " doi
  99. (2000). Participatory approaches in health promotion and planning: A literature review. London, Health Development Agency.
  100. (2002). Participatory Planning as Dialogue: The Northern Ireland Regional Strategic Framework and its Public Examination process. " doi
  101. (2001). Partnerships and power in community regeneration. In: Partnership Working: Policy and practice. doi
  102. (2001). Playing the game of partnership. In: Social Policy Review 1. Developments and debates:
  103. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. doi
  104. (2001). Policy Analysis. In: Stud3dng the Organisaiion and Delivejy o Health Services.
  105. (1993). Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. doi
  106. (1982). Policy Making and Planning in the Health Sector. Croom Helm, doi
  107. (1977). Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. doi
  108. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge, doi
  109. (1995). Power and participatory development: theoly and practice. London, Intermediate doi
  110. (1970). Power and Poverty: Theory- and Practice.
  111. (2000). Power and Powerlessness of Urban Partnership in Northem Ireland: Democratic Performance and Institutional Baggage. Breaking Down Barriers, Brighton, Breaking Down Barriers Conference, I Vh
  112. (1994). Power in movement: social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, doi
  113. (1973). Power, Public Opinion. and Policy in a Metropolitan Communily: A Case Study of Syjacuse doi
  114. (1999). Primajy Care and Health InlDrovement Programmes: Transcendiniz Berlin Walls? Primary Care and NHS Reforms, Conference Leeds.
  115. (1991). Probeza. participation y salud: casos latinoamericanos.
  116. (1998). Public health panels in the UK: influence at the margins. In: Innovations in Political Participation.
  117. (1999). Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values. " doi
  118. (1999). Public participation and marginalized groups: the community development model. " doi
  119. (1998). Public Services under New Labour: Collaborative Discourses and Local Networking. " Public Policy and Administration doi
  120. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data. doi
  121. (1995). Real World Research.
  122. (1997). Reasons for hope: instructive experiences in rural development. doi
  123. (1996). Reflection from the Participation Sourcebook, World Bank.
  124. (1995). Representing the community? In: Research and Change in Urban Communily Health.
  125. (2002). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. doi
  126. (1998). Resource dependency and community participation in primary health care. " doi
  127. (1991). Revresenting Order: Crime, Law. and Justice in the News Media. Milton Keynes,
  128. (2001). Run for the people by someone else. "
  129. (1997). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. doi
  130. (1968). Social Theojy and Social Structure.
  131. Southwark and Lewisham Health Action Zone (2001). An evaluation of commissionin
  132. Strategic Health Authority PPI Leads Network (2003) Performance Improvement Framework for Patient and
  133. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. doi
  134. (1990). The anti-politics machine: development. depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, doi
  135. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks,
  136. (1993). The critical villager: beyond community participation. doi
  137. (1998). the Environment, Transport and the Regions doi
  138. the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000). Our Towns and Cities: The Future Delivering an Urban Renaissance - Regional Case Studies. doi
  139. the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000b). Joining It Un Locally: The Evidence Base., Report of Policy. Action Team 17. London, The Stationery Office.
  140. (2001). The first year of Health Improvement Programmes; views from Directors of Public Health. " doi
  141. (2002). The guessing game: PCTs and patient choice. " Primary Care Report.
  142. (1996). The Health Care Policy Process. doi
  143. (1992). The Health of the Nation. London, The Stationery Office.
  144. (2001). The individual and primary care: service user, reflexive choice maker and collective actor. " doi
  145. (1976). The Limits of Administration. doi
  146. (1996). The New Public Health: Health and self in the age of risk. doi
  147. (1988). The New Public Health. Buckingham,
  148. (1994). The Penguin Dictionary of Sociolga. London,
  149. (1978). The Policy Cycle.
  150. (1994). The politics of decentralisation: revitalising local democraU. doi
  151. (1984). The politics of participation. In: Public Participation in Health: Towards a clearer
  152. (2002). The public is too subjective: public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. " doi
  153. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism, Milton Keynes,
  154. (2000). The Stationery Office. ý I Department of Health
  155. (1968). The Vertical Axis of Community Organization and the Structure of Power. In: The Search for Communi! y
  156. (1999). The widening gap: health inequalities and policy in Britain. doi
  157. (1999). Thompson Health Region
  158. (1986). Top-down 'and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. " doi
  159. (1996). Undcrstanding Particularism. In: Critical Social Policy: A Reader. (Ed. by D. doi
  160. (2001). Understanding the role of contextual influences on local healthcare decision making: case study results from Ontario, Canada. " doi
  161. (2001). Update - Health Improvement Programmes. January. London: Health Development Agency; Hardiman,
  162. (2003). Using the Internet as a Research Tool,
  163. (2000). Variations on a Theme: New Labour, Health Inequalities and Policy Failure. In: Analysing Health
  164. (1999). Voluntary Services Council
  165. (1997). What does the public think about rationing? A review of the evidence. In: Rationing: talk and action.
  166. (1998). Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation. " doi
  167. (2001). Who Shall Lead? The Public, Of Course. The Promise and Perils of Public Involvement,
  168. (2002). Widening the debate? Consultation and participation in local health care planning in the English and Swedish health services. " doi
  169. (1993). World Health Organization doi
  170. (1996). Yes, but IS IT empowerment? Initiation, Implementation and Outcomes of Community Action. In: Critical Perspectives on

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.