Location of Repository

Multidisciplinary perspectives on intercultural conflict: the "Bermuda Triangle" of conflict, culture and communication

By Nathalie van Meurs and Helen Spencer-Oatey

Abstract

A few decades ago, managers spent more than 20% of their time trying to resolve conflicts (Thomas and Schmidt 1976). Nowadays, conflicts are probably even more complex and time consuming to resolve, because technological advances, the world‟s exponential growth rate, and globalization have led to increased contact between culturally diverse people. Different norms, values, and language can make negotiating more stressful and less satisfactory (Brett and Okumura 1998), and conflict cannot be managed effectively without simultaneously considering both culture and communication. In fact, the three concepts of conflict, culture and communication are like a Bermuda Triangle – hazardous conditions will emerge unless the three are simultaneously handled appropriately.\ud Conflict processes are studied by researchers in a range of disciplines, including organizational behaviour, management studies, (intercultural) communication studies, peace studies, and applied linguistics. Unfortunately, research in these various disciplines tends to exist in parallel fields, with infrequent passages across theoretical and empirical divides. In this chapter we provide an overview of key theoretical frameworks, explore some of the main views as to the impact of culture, and consider the interrelationships between conflict, culture and communication. We call for more interdisciplinary research, so that boundaries can be broken down and illuminating new insights can emerge

Topics: P1, HM
Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3139

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. doi
  2. (1976). A survey of managerial interests with respect to conflict. doi
  3. (1983). Achieving integrative agreement.
  4. (1992). Afzalur doi
  5. (1986). and Kwang-Kuo Hwang doi
  6. (2000). Argumentation and resulting problems in the negotiation of rapport in a German–Chinese conversation.
  7. (1992). Carment
  8. (1999). Chinese conflict management styles: an exploratory study.
  9. (1999). Communicating across Cultures.
  10. (1997). Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. doi
  11. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between AfricanAmerican customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. doi
  12. (1976). Conflict and conflict management.
  13. (2004). Conflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese: arguments in university faculty meetings. doi
  14. (2002). Conflict management in Japanese public affairs talk shows. doi
  15. (1998). Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences. doi
  16. (1994). Cultural styles of conflict management in Japanese and Americans: passivity, covertness, and effectiveness of strategies. doi
  17. (2005). Culture and mediation: a contemporary processual analysis from southwestern Gambia. doi
  18. (2005). Culture-based conversational constraints theory. Individual- and culturelevel analyses.
  19. (2001). Culture's Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. doi
  20. (2003). Derek Bousfield and Anne Wichmann doi
  21. Erving 1963 Behavior in Public Places. doi
  22. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. doi
  23. (2009). Holmes In this volume Humour across cultures: joking in the multicultural workplace, Chapter 8. doi
  24. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. doi
  25. (1998). Inter- and intra-cultural negotiation: U.S. and Japanese negotiators. doi
  26. (2004). Leadership and managing conflict in meetings. doi
  27. (1990). Liebrand doi
  28. (2003). Managing rapport in intercultural business interactions: a comparison of two Chinese–British welcome meetings. doi
  29. (2001). Negotiation behaviors when cultures collide: The U.S. and Japan. doi
  30. (2003). Negotiations between British and Dutch managers: Cultural values, approaches to conflict management, and perceived negotiation satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  31. (2002). Organisationskultur und individuelle Werte: Belege für eine gemeinsame Struktur [Organizational culture and individual values: evidence for a common structure].
  32. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. Originally published as Universals in language usage: politeness phenomenon. doi
  33. (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. In: doi
  34. (2000). Rapport management: a framework for analysis. doi
  35. (1991). Rose and Shinobu Kitayama doi
  36. (2006). Shu-Cheng Chi and Leigh Anne Liu doi
  37. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: a cross-national study. doi
  38. (1991). Stella Ting-Toomey and Sung Ling Lin doi
  39. (2005). The intercultural conflict style inventory: a conceptual framework and measure of intercultural conflict resolution approaches. doi
  40. (1974). The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. doi
  41. (2002). Trevor-Roberts and Louise Earnshaw doi
  42. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. doi
  43. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. doi
  44. (2000). Vladimir Zegarac and Helen Spencer-Oatey doi
  45. (1999). What motivates choice of conflict strategies? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.