Location of Repository

Research issues in complementary therapy

By Janet Richardson

Abstract

A question frequently asked by healthcare professionals and journalists is, "Do complementary therapies work?" Such a\ud question needs to acknowledge that therapies that come under the umbrella of 'complementary and alternative therapies' are many and diverse. The extent to which therapeutic interventions are defined as complementary or alternative is influenced by the leading paradigm of the day, and the power of professional bodies. The House of Lords Select Committee report divides complementary therapies into three discrete groups (Table 1). This classification was essential to the Select Committee's conclusions regarding regulation, research and availability\ud on the National Health Service (NHS) of the approaches

Topics: UOW2
OAI identifier: oai:westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk:376
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). Assessing efficacy of complementary medicine: Adding qualitative research methods to the ‘Gold Standard’”,
  2. (1991). Clinical Research in Complementary Medicine: the importance of patient selection”,
  3. (2003). Complementary and Alternative Medicine: How do we know if it works?”
  4. complementary therapies for use in the National Health Service: ‘Horses for Courses’. Part 1: The design challenge”,
  5. (2001). Complementary therapies: what is the evidence for their use?”,
  6. (1993). Developing Integrated Medicine: Report of the RCCM Research Fellowship in
  7. (1997). Evaluating complementary therapy for use in the National Health Service: ‘Horses for courses’. Part 2: Alternative research strategies”,
  8. (2003). Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine on the Internet”,
  9. (2002). Guest Editorial: Evidence-Based Complementary Medicine: Rigour, relevance and the swampy lowlands”,
  10. (1984). New Paradigm Research and Holistic Medicine”,
  11. (1989). Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials”,
  12. (1995). Researching and Evaluating Complementary Therapies: The State of the Debate”, Collaborating Centre for Health Service Research, Nuffield Institute for Health,
  13. (1988). Single-case research designs”,
  14. (1997). Systematic Clinical Auditing in Complementary Medicine: Rationale, Concept, and a Pilot Study”, Alternative Therapies

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.